|
|
|
| Application of Genomic Selection Techniques in Livestock Breeding |
| YAN Cheng-Qi, ZHAO Yuan, TIAN Hui-Bin, ZHANG Yu-Kun, LI Xiao-Long, ZHANG Qi, PU Meng-Ru, GAO Lei, XIAO Zi-Yue, FENG Lian-Jun, LI Fa-Di, WANG Wei-Min* |
| College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology/State Key Laboratory of Grassland Seed Innovation and Grassland Agricultural Ecosystem, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the deep integration of genomics and quantitative genetics, the practical application of genomic selection techniques in livestock breeding continues to expand. Particularly since the turn of the 21st century, iterative advancements in sequencing technology have reduced the cost of whole-genome genotyping, accelerating the adoption of genomic selection across a broader range of livestock species. This approach demonstrates significant potential in enhancing the production performance of selected populations, strengthening disease resistance within herds, and optimising breeding strategies.This paper provided a systematic review of the research progress and application of genomic selection technology in livestock breeding. The full paper revolves around: (1) the principles and development history of the technology, elucidating the methodological framework for genome-wide molecular marker screening and genetic effect assessment; (2) the methods and models used in the technology, involving traditional genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) assessment methods such as best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and Bayesian method, as well as new methods of machine learning, such as support vector machines and random forests; (3) the methods to improve the accuracy of genome selection, considerations of across breeds, combining new methods and approaches such as genome-wide association analysis to increase the reliability and usability of the technology; (4) analysis of the current status of application, focusing on the great potential of the technology in improving the production performance of livestock, breeding for disease resistance and optimising breeding strategies. This paper constructed a three-dimensional analysis system of technology principle-application practice-trend development to provide theoretical support for the development of livestock breeding technology in the context of smart agriculture.
|
|
Received: 16 June 2025
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
*wangweimin@lzu.edu.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈栋, 王书杰, 赵真坚, 等. 2023. 基于机器学习的猪生长性状基因组预测[J]. 遗传, 45(10): 922-932.
(Chen D, Wang S-J, Zhao Z-J, et al.2023. Genomic prediction of pig growth traits based on machine learning[J]. Hereditas, 45(10): 922-932.)
[2] Araujo A C, Carneiro P L S, Oliveira H R, et al.2023. SNP- and haplotype-based single-step genomic predictions for body weight, wool, and reproductive traits in North American Rambouillet sheep[J]. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 140(2): 216-234.
[3] Basu A, Mitra R, Liu H, et al.2018. RWEN: Response-weighted elastic net for prediction of chemosensitivity of cancer cell lines[J]. Bioinformatics, 34(19): 3332-3339.
[4] Bell A, McNally J, Smith D V, et al.2019. Quantification of differences in resistance to gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep using a multivariate blood parameter[J]. Veterinary Parasitology, 270: 31-39.
[5] Bolormaa S, Brown D J, Swan A A, et al.2017. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep[J]. Animal Genetics, 48(3): 338-348.
[6] Brito F V, Neto J, Sargolzaei M, et al.2011. Accuracy of genomic selection in simulated populations mimicking the extent of linkage disequilibrium in beef cattle[J]. BMC Genetics, 12(1): 80.
[7] Callaby R, Kelly R, Mazeri S, et al.2020. Genetic diversity of Cameroon cattle and a putative genomic map for resistance to bovine tuberculosis[J]. Frontiers In Genetics, 11: 550215.
[8] Calus M P, Huang H, Vereijken A, et al.2014. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: A comparison between linear methods[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 46(1): 57.
[9] Carracelas B, Navajas E A, Vera B, et al.2022. Genome-wide association study of parasite resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in Corriedale Sheep[J]. Genes, 13(9): 1548.
[10] Cavani L, Braz C U, Giglioti R, et al.2020. Genomic study of babesia bovis infection level and its association with tick count in hereford and braford cattle[J]. Frontiers in Immunology, 11: 1905.
[11] Christensen O F, Madsen P, Nielsen B, et al.2012. Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs[J]. Animal, 6(10): 1565-1571.
[12] Curzon A Y, Ezra E, Weller J I, et al.2024. Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) effectively models small cattle populations: Lessons from the Israeli-Holstein Herdbook[J]. BMC Genomics, 25(1): 1147.
[13] Edeh M O, Dalal S, Obagbuwa I C, et al.2022. Bootstrapping random forest and CHAID for prediction of white spot disease among shrimp farmers[J]. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 20876.
[14] Fang L, Sahana G, Ma P, et al.2017. Exploring the genetic architecture and improving genomic prediction accuracy for mastitis and milk production traits in dairy cattle by mapping variants to hepatic transcriptomic regions responsive to intra-mammary infection[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 49(1): 44.
[15] Fu C, Ostersen T, Christensen O F, et al.2021. Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 53(1): 79.
[16] Goddard M E, Hayes B J.2007. Genomic selection[J]. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 124(6): 323-330.
[17] Gusmawati N, Soulard B, Selmaoui-Folcher N, et al.2018. Surveying shrimp aquaculture pond activity using multitemporal VHSR satellite images - case study from the Perancak estuary, Bali, Indonesia[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 131: 49-60.
[18] Habier D, Fernando R L, Dekkers J C M.2007. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values[J]. Genetics, 177(4): 2389-2397.
[19] Haque M A, Iqbal A, Bae H, et al.2023. Assessment of genomic breeding values and their accuracies for carcass traits in Jeju Black cattle using whole-genome SNP chip panels[J]. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 140(5): 519-531.
[20] Hayes B, Goddard M.2010. Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding[J]. Genome, 53(11): 876-883.
[21] Hayes B J, Copley J, Dodd E, et al.2023. Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 55(1): 71.
[22] Hayes B J, Duff C J, Hine B C, et al.2024. Genomic estimated breeding values for bovine respiratory disease resistance in Angus feedlot cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 102: skae113.
[23] Jiang Y, Yang M, Wang S, et al.2020. Emerging role of deep learning-based artificial intelligence in tumor pathology[J]. Cancer Communications, 40(4): 154-166.
[24] Lande R, Thompson R.1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits[J]. Genetics, 124(3): 743-756.
[25] Legarra A, Ducrocq V.2012. Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic genomic and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(8): 4629-4645.
[26] Liu Y, Zhang M, Yue B, et al.2024. Comparison of predictive ability of single-trait and multitrait genomic selection models for body growth traits in Maiwa yaks[J]. Animal, 18(11): 101350.
[27] Ma H, Li H, Ge F, et al.2024. Improving genomic predictions in multi-breed cattle populations: A comparative analysis of BayesRand GBLUP models[J]. Genes, 15(2): 253.
[28] Mallikarjunappa S, Brito L F, Pant S D, et al.2021. Johne's disease in dairy cattle: An immunogenetic perspective[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8: 718987.
[29] Martínez-Álvaro M, Mattock J, González-Recio Ó, et al.2024. Including microbiome information in a multi-trait genomic evaluation: A case study on longitudinal growth performance in beef cattle[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 56(1): 19.
[30] Massender E, Brito L F, Maignel L, et al.2022. Single- and multiple-breed genomic evaluations for conformation traits in Canadian Alpine and Saanen dairy goats[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 105(7): 5985-6000.
[31] Menezes G L, Valente Junior D T, Ferreira R E P, et al.2025. Empowering informed choices: How computer vision can assists consumers in making decisions about meat quality[J]. Meat Science, 219: 109675.
[32] Meuwissen T H E, Hayes B J, Goddard ME.2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps[J]. Genetics, 157(4): 1819-1829.
[33] Negro A, Cesarani A, Cortellari M, et al.2024. A comparison of genetic and genomic breeding values in Saanen and Alpine goats[J]. Animal, 18(4): 101118.
[34] Nilson S M, Burke J M, Murdoch B M, et al.2024. Pedigree diversity and implications for genetic selection of Katahdin sheep[J]. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 141(3): 304-316.
[35] Oliveira C S, Camargo L S A, Silva M V G B D, et al.2023. Embryo biopsies for genomic selection in tropical dairy cattle[J]. Animal Reproduction Science, 20(2): e20230064.
[36] Palaniappan R, Sundaraj K, Sundaraj S.2014. A comparative study of the svm and k-nn machine learning algorithms for the diagnosis of respiratory pathologies using pulmonary acoustic signals[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 15(1): 223.
[37] Pradhan U K, Meher P K, Naha S, et al.2023. RBPLight: A computational tool for discovery of plant-specific RNA-binding proteins using light gradient boosting machine and ensemble of evolutionary features[J]. Briefings in Functional Genomics, 22(5): 401-410.
[38] Ramirez-Medina E, Velazquez-Salinas L, Valladares A, et al.2024. Assessment of the effect of deleting the African swine fever virus gene R298L on virus replication and virulence of the georgia2010 isolate[J]. Viruses, 16(12): 1911.
[39] Ramos P V B, De Oliveira Menezes G R, Da Silva D A, et al.2024. Genomic analysis of feed efficiency traits in beef cattle using random regression models[J]. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 141(3): 291-303.
[40] Rodriguez Neira J D, Peripolli E, De Negreiros M P M, et al.2022. Prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using SNP arrays based on different marker densities in Nellore cattle using the ssGBLUP[J]. Journal of Applied Genetics, 63(2): 389-400.
[41] Sandhu K S, Shiv A, Kaur G, et al.2022. Integrated approach in genomic selection to accelerate genetic gain in sugarcane[J]. Plants (Basel), 11(16): 2139.
[42] Schneider H, Krizanac A M, Falker Gieske C,et al.2024. Genomic dissection of the correlation between milk yield and various health traits using functional and evolutionary information about imputed sequence variants of 34497 German Holstein cows[J]. BMC Genomics, 25(1): 265.
[43] Shi M, Wang C, Li X-Z, et al.2021. EEG signal classification based on SVM with improved squirrel search algorithm[J]. Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, 66(2): 137-152.
[44] Slanger W D.1980. Comparison of within-herd genetic evaluation procedures for beef cattle weaning weight[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 51(3): 595-603.
[45] Strandén I, Kantanen J, Russo I-R M, et al.2019. Genomic selection strategies for breeding adaptation and production in dairy cattle under climate change[J]. Heredity, 123(3): 307-317.
[46] Tang Z, Yin L, Yin D, et al.2023. Development and application of an efficient genomic mating method to maximize the production performances of three-way crossbred pigs[J]. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24(1): bbac587.
[47] Tsairidou S, Woolliams J A, Allen A R, et al.2014. Genomic prediction for tuberculosis resistance in dairy cattle[J]. Public Library of Science ONE, 9(5): e96728.
[48] Tsuruta S, Lourenco D A L, Misztal I, et al.2015. Genotype by environment interactions on culling rates and 305-day milk yield of Holstein cows in 3 US regions[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(8): 5796-5805.
[49] Tu T C, Lin C J, Liu M C, et al.2024. Comparison of genomic prediction accuracy using different models for egg production traits in Taiwan country chicken[J]. Poultry Science, 103(10): 104063.
[50] Vahedi S M, Salek Ardetani S, Brito L F, et al.2023. Expanding the application of haplotype-based genomic predictions to the wild: A case of antibody response against Teladorsagia circumcincta in Soay sheep[J]. BMC Genomics, 24(1): 335.
[51] Vinet A, Fouéré C, Cuyabano B C D, et al.2024. Long-lasting effects of in utero heat stress on subsequent performances of heifers and primiparous cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 107(12): 11065-11077.
[52] Wang X, Shi S, Ali Khan Md Y, et al.2024. Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in dairy cattle using the biologically annotated neural networks framework[J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 15(1): 87.
[53] Wang X, Zhang Z, Du H, et al.2024. Predictive ability of multi-population genomic prediction methods of phenotypes for reproduction traits in Chinese and Austrian pigs[J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 56(1): 49.
[54] Wang Y, Zhu B, Wang J, et al.2024. Evaluation of genomic mating approach based on genetic algorithms for long-term selection in Huaxi cattle[J]. BMC Genomics, 25(1): 1140.
[55] Wei J, Sun J, Pan Y, et al.2024. Revealing genes related teat number traits via genetic variation in Yorkshire pigs based on whole-genome sequencing[J]. BMC Genomics, 25(1): 1217.
[56] Zhang J, Li L, Lv M, et al.2022. An improved Bayesian shrinkage regression algorithm for genomic selection[J]. Genes, 13(12): 2193.
[57] Zhu S, Guo T, Yuan C, et al.2021. Evaluation of Bayesian alphabet and GBLUP based on different marker density for genomic prediction in Alpine Merino sheep[J]. G3-Genes Genomes Genetics, 11(11): jkab206. |
|
|
|
