|
|
|
| Study on the Mechanism of CaMV 35S Enhancer Regulating Gene Expression in Maize (Zea mays) |
| GUO Jin-Jie1, ZHANG Dan1, ZHANG Wei1, ZHANG Fang-Dong1*, DU Deng-Xiang2* |
1 Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
2 School of Biological and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Maize (Zea mays) is an important food crop, feed source and industrial raw material. With the development of bio-technology, transgenic and other new technologies are widely used in maize breeding. Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV 35S) promoter and its enhancer are widely used in transgenic operation of maize and other crops. Therefore, studying the mechanism of CaMV 35S enhancer has important theoretical value for future application. Two trait mutants were screened from a maize activation-tagging mutant library previously constructed by the research group on genetic improvement of maize. Based on the identification of artificial transposon insertion sites in the chromosomes, the spatio-temporal variation of gene RNA expression in the range of about 100 kb upstream and downstream of the transposon insertion sites was analyzed using qPCR. The results showed that the enhancer of CaMV 35S significantly up-regulated the gene expression of adjacent genes (P<0.05), and the transcriptionally increased genes were distributed upstream and downstream of the transposon insertion site, with activation distance of up to 63.7 kb. Of the 4 genes up-regulated expression, the enhancement was dose-dependent, and the expression of the homozygous mutant was significantly higher than that of the heterozygous mutant (P<0.05). Although the CaMV 35S enhancer increased the transcription level of genes in the maize mutants, it did not significantly change the expression pattern of genes in different tissues. The scope, dosage effect, and tissue specificity of CaMV 35S enhancer in maize provide an experimental basis for subsequent use in maize molecular biology, and genetic engineering, and can also provide reference for the application of the promoter in other plants.
|
|
Received: 20 July 2022
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
*ddx@mail.hzau.edu.cn; fdzhang@mail.hzau.edu.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] 杜邓襄. 2017. 玉米高效转基因体系的建立与基于人工 Ac/ Ds 转座子的激活标签突变体生成系的构建[D]. 博士学位论文, 华中农业大学, 导师: 曾汉来. pp. 63-77.
(Du D X. 2017. Establishment of a high efficiency transgenic system and construction of versatile Ac/Ds based activation-tagged mutant generating system in maize [D]. Thesis for Ph. D., Huazhong Agricultural University, Supervisor: Zeng H L, pp. 63-77.)
[2] 王洁. 2018. 玉米超表达标签突变体生成系 DT1、DT2 的特性及突变材料研究[D]. 硕士学位论文, 华中农业大学, 导师: 张方东. pp. 40-56.
(Wang J. 2018. The study of overexpression tagging mutant generating system DT1, DT2 in maize and mutant materials[D]. Thesis for M.S., Huazhong Agricultural University, Supervisor: Zhang F D, pp. 40-56.)
[3] Benfey P N, Ren L, Chua N H. 1989. The CaMV 35S enhancer contains at least two domains which can confer different developmental and tissue-specific expression patterns[J]. The EMBO Journal, 8(8): 2195-2202.
[4] Chen C, He B S, Liu X X, et al. 2019. Pyrophosphate-fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP1) regulates starch biosynthesis and seed development via heterotetramer formation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 18(1): 83-95.
[5] Davies J P, Reddy V S, Liu X L, et al. 2019. Development of an activation tagging system for maize[J]. Plant Direct, 3(2): e00118.
[6] Deng M D, Wang Y, Kuzma M, et al. 2020. Activation tagging identifies Arabidopsis transcription factor AtMYB68 for heat and drought tolerance at yield determining reproductive stages[J]. The Plant Journal, 104(6): 1535-1550.
[7] Fang R X, Nagy F, Sivasubramaniam S, et al. 1989. Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants[J]. The Plant Cell, 1(1): 141-150.
[8] Graaff E van der, Dulk-Ras A D, Hooykaas P J.et al. 2000. Activation tagging of the LEAFY PETIOLE gene affects leaf petiole development in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Development, 127: 4971-4980.
[9] Huang J, Tang D, Shen Y, et al. 2010. Activation of gibberellin 2-oxidase 6 decreases active gibberellin levels and creates a dominant semi-dwarf phenotype in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 37(1): 23-36.
[10] Jeong D H, An S, Park S, et al. 2006. Generation of a flanking sequence-tag database for activation-tagging lines in japonica rice[J]. The Plant Journal, 45(1): 123-132.
[11] Kay R, Chan A M Y, Daly M, et al. 1987. Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes[J]. Science, 236(4806): 1299-1302.
[12] Lee J, Moon S, Jang S, et al. 2020. OsbHLH073 negatively regulates internode elongation and plant height by modulating GA homeostasis in rice[J]. Plants, 9(4): 547.
[13] Liao C C, Chen L J, Lo S F, et al. 2019. EAT-Rice: A predictive model for flanking gene expression of T-DNA insertion activation-tagged rice mutants by machine learning approaches[J]. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(5): e1006942.
[14] Lin Y, Meng F L, Fang C, et al. 2019. Rapid validation of transcriptional enhancers using agrobacterium-mediated transient assay[J]. Plant Methods, 15(1): 1-10.
[15] Liu R C, Zou X P, Wang Y, et al. 2020. A 100 bp GAGA motif-containing sequence in AGAMOUS second intron is able to suppress the activity of CaMV35S enhancer in vegetative tissues[J]. PLOS ONE, 15(3): e0230203.
[16] Liu Z R, Zhou C H, Wu K Q. 2008. Creation and analysis of a novel chimeric promoter for the complete containment of pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 27(6): 995-1004.
[17] Maiti I B, Gowda S, Kiernan J, et al. 1997. Promoter/leader deletion analysis and plant expression vectors with the Figwort mosaic virus (FMV) full length transcript (FLt) promoter containing single or double enhancer domains[J]. Transgenic Research, 6(2): 143-156.
[18] Marsch-Martínez N. 2011. A Transposon-based Activation Tagging System for Gene Function Discovery in Arabi- dopsis[M]. Plant Transcription Factors. Humana Press. New York. pp. 67-83.
[19] Moin M, Bakshi A, Saha A, et al. 2016. Activation tagging in indica rice identifies ribosomal proteins as potential targets for manipulation of water-use efficiency and abiotic stress tolerance in plants[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 39(11): 2440-2459.
[20] Neff M M, Nguyen S M, Malancharuvil E J, et al. 1999. BAS1: A gene regulating brassinosteroid levels and light responsiveness in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96(26): 15316-15323.
[21] Odell J T, Nagy F, Chua N H. 1985. Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter[J]. Nature, 313(6005): 810-812.
[22] Omirulleh S, Abraham M, Golovkin M, et al. 1993. Activity of a chimeric promoter with the doubled CaMV35S enhancer element in pro-toplast-derived cells and transgenic plants in maize[J]. Plant Molecular Biology 21: 415-428.
[23] Panara F, Calderini O, Porceddu A. 2018. T-DNA Insertional Mutagenesis and Activation Tagging in Medicago trun- catula[M]. Functional Genomics in Medicago truncatula. Humana Press. New York. pp. 83-105.
[24] Petersen M I, Alvarez I, Trono K G, et al. 2018. Quantification of bovine leukemia virus proviral DNA using a low- cost real-time polymerase chain reaction[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(7): 6366-6374.
[25] Ren S, Johnston J S, Shippen D E, et al. 2004. TELOMER-ASE ACTIVATOR1 induces telomerase activity and potentiates responses to auxin in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 16(11): 2910-2922.
[26] Singer S D, Cox K D, Liu Z. 2011. Enhancer-promoter interference and its prevention in transgenic plants[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 30(5): 723-731.
[27] Waki T, Miyashima S, Nakanishi, et al. 2013. A GAL4-based targeted activation tagging system in Arabidopsis thali- ana[J]. The Plant Journal, 73(3): 357-367.
[28] Wan S Y, Wu J X, Zhang Z G, et al. 2009. Activation tagging, an efficient tool for functional analysis of the rice genome[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 69(1-2): 69-80.
[29] Wang G, Wang C, Lu G, et al. 2020. Knockouts of a late flowering gene via CRISPR-Cas9 confer early maturity in rice at multiple field locations[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 104(1): 137-150.
[30] Weigel D, Ahn J H, Blázquez M A, et al. 2000. Activation tagging in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiology, 122(4): 1003-1014.
[31] Yoon J, Cho L H, Yang W, et al. 2020. Homeobox transcription factor OsZHD2 promotes root meristem activity in rice by inducing ethylene biosynthesis[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71(18): 5348-5364.
[32] Zhang J J, Wu S Y, Jiang L, et al. 2015. A detailed analysis of the leaf rolling mutant sll2 reveals complex nature in regulation of bulliform cell development in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Plant Biology, 17(2): 437-448.
[33] Zhang P, Jia Y J, Shi J X, et al. 2019. The WY domain in the Phytophthora effector PSR 1 is required for infection and RNA silencing suppression activity[J]. New Phytologist, 223(2): 839-852.
[34] Zheng N, Li T, Dittman J D, et al. 2020. CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing using egg cell-specific promoters in Arabi- dopsis and soybean[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11: 800. |
|
|
|
