联系我们 加入收藏
 
年期检索 高级检索
33
2025年8月8日 星期五
  2015, Vol. 23 Issue (6): 831-840    
  研究资源与技术改进 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
瘤胃细菌群落多样性研究中变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)方法的优化
张俊1,赵圣国1,王加启1,卜登攀1,金迪1,杜洪2
1. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所
2. 中国农业科学院 北京畜牧兽医研究所/动物营养学国家重点实验室
Optimization of Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) Protocol in Analyzing Rumen Bacterial Community Diversity
全文: PDF (1235 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为了提高瘤胃细菌多样性研究中变性梯度凝胶电泳(denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, DGGE)方法的准确性,本研究对DGGE的最佳变性剂梯度范围、PCR扩增程序和PCR产物处理方法进行了优化。设计DGGE变性剂浓度梯度为35%~70%、40%~60%和55%~65%,分别利用一步PCR和修补PCR(reconditioning PCR)对瘤胃细菌16S rDNA进行扩增;PCR产物分别经变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(denatured polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, d-PAGE)和绿豆核酸酶纯化;之后对DGGE凝胶图谱聚类分析,并选取部分DGGE条带割胶测序。结果表明,DGGE的变性剂浓度为40%~60%时,DGGE图谱中条带分离效果较好。修补PCR结合d-PAGE纯化在一定程度上可减少PCR产物中的单链DNA(single-stranded DNA, ssDNA)。通过聚类和条带割胶测序分析发现,不同处理方法条件下DGGE图谱条带分布不同,DGGE凝胶图谱中的单一条带并不能代表是单一菌种。本研究在用DGGE对瘤胃细菌群落多样性分析时使用40%~60%凝胶变性剂浓度,并用修补PCR结合d-PAGE纯化样品DNA可获得最佳效果。研究结果为瘤胃微生物样品DGGE分析提供了参考资料。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张俊
赵圣国
王加启
卜登攀
金迪
杜洪
关键词 瘤胃细菌群落变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)单链DNA(ssDNA)    
Abstract:In order to improve the accuracy of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in the analysis of rumen bacteria community diversity, the best range of DGGE denaturing gradient, PCR amplification procedure and treatments methods of PCR products had been optimized in this study. Three denaturing gradients, 35%~70%, 40%~60% and 55%~65%, were designed for DGGE, and normal PCR and reconditioning PCR were used to amplify rumen bacteria 16S rDNA, respectively. After that, the PCR products were purified via denatured polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (d-PAGE) and mung bean nuclease respectively, as well as cluster and some bands sequences analysis. The results showed that the DNA bands in gel were well-distributed at 40%~60% denaturing gradients. Reconditioning PCR plus d-PAGE purification could minimize single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to a certain extent. According to cluster and sequence analysis, different treatments method could result in different bands distribution in DGGE profiles, and the single strand could not completely represented unique bacteria species. In conclusion, the better denaturing gradient for rumen bacteria community DGGE was 40%~60%, and reconditioning PCR plus d-PAGE purification could be used to purify samples before DGGE analysis to obtain the better profile. The study provides basic references to DGGE in the analyzing of rumen bacteria community diversity.
Key wordsRumen    Bacterial community    Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)    Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)
收稿日期: 2014-10-21      出版日期: 2015-04-13
基金资助:国家自然科学基金;中国农业科学院科技创新工程;“十二五”科技支撑计划
通讯作者: 卜登攀     E-mail: budengpan@126.com
引用本文:   
张俊 赵圣国 王加启 卜登攀 金迪 杜洪. 瘤胃细菌群落多样性研究中变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)方法的优化[J]. , 2015, 23(6): 831-840.
链接本文:  
http://journal05.magtech.org.cn/Jwk_ny/CN/     或     http://journal05.magtech.org.cn/Jwk_ny/CN/Y2015/V23/I6/831
 
版权所有 © 2014 《农业生物技术学报》编辑部   京ICP备11035905号-3
地址:北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号中国农业大学生命科学楼1053室 邮编:100193
电话:010-62733684 传真:010-62731615 E-mail: nsjxb@cau.edu.cn