|
|
|
| Establishment and Application of FecB Gene Editing Method for Electrotransfer of Sheep Embryos |
| MA Xiu-Ling1,2,3, CHEN Ying1,2, LIN Jia-Peng1,2, WANG Li-Qin1,2, GULIMIRE•Abudureyimu1,2, WU Xiang-Li1,2, HUANG Jun-Cheng1,2, WANG Xu-Guang3,*, WU Yang-Sheng1,2,* |
1 Key Laboratory of Genetics Breeding and Reproduction of Grass Feeding Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural affairs, Urumqi 830011, China;
2 Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology of XinJiang, Urumqi 830011, China;
3 College of Animal Sciences, XinJiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract FecB (fecundity booroola, FecB) gene is one of the multifetal major genes of Ovis aries, which is a single-base mutation form in the coding region of bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B gene. Sheep with FecB gene can be produced by gene editing technology. Gene-edited sheep are usually produced by microinjecting gene-edited material into a fertilized egg followed by transplantation to obtain offspring. Electrotransfer is a simple and easy method to introduce gene-edited materials into cells. This study aimed to establish an electrotransfer-based FecB gene editing method for sheep embryos. Gene editing materials such as Cas9 nuclease, small guide RNA (sgRNA), single stranded DNA (ssODN) and inhibitor Scr7 were used and the effects of different voltages, different time periods and different post-fertilization times on sheep embryo development and editing efficiency were compared. The results showed that the embryo had a higher survival rate and editing efficiency when the electrotransfer parameters were set at voltage of 40 V, duration of 2 ms and 4~6 h after fertilization with 5 repetitions. The overall editing efficiency reached 88%, and the percentage of embryos with point mutation was up to 60%. After transplantation of electrotransferred embryos, 3 FecB gene-edited lambs were obtained. In summary, this study established a simple, economical and efficient gene editing method for sheep fertilized eggs based on electrotransfer, which provided technical support for accelerating the promotion and application of sheep genome editing breeding and improving reproductive performance.
|
|
Received: 13 December 2024
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
*xj_wys@126.com; wangxuguang@xjau.edu.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] Anzalone D A, Palazzese L, Czernik M, et al.2021. Controlled spermatozoa-oocyte interaction improves embryo quality in sheep[J]. Scientific Reports, 11(1): 22629.
[2] Basila M, Kelley M L, Smith A V B.2017. Minimal 2'-O-methyl phosphorothioate linkage modification pattern of synthetic guide RNAs for increased stability and efficient CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing avoiding cellular toxicity[J]. PLOS ONE, 12(11): e0188593.
[3] Chen Y, Wu Y S, Lin J P, et al.2021. Transcriptome profiles of pre-pubertal and adult in vitro matured ovine oocytes obtained from FSH-stimulated animals[J]. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 56(8): 1085-1094.
[4] Hashimoto M, Yamashita Y,Takemoto T.2016. Electroporation of Cas9 protein/sgRNA into early pronuclear zygotes generates non-mosaic mutants in the mouse[J]. Developmental Biology, 418: 1-9.
[5] Lamas-Toranzo I, Galiano-Cogolludo B, Cornudella-Ardiaca F, et al.2019. Strategies to reduce genetic mosaicism following CRISPR-mediated genome edition in bovine embryos[J]. Scientific Reports, 9(1):14900.
[6] Lin J C, van Eenennaam A L.2021. Electroporation-mediated genome editing of livestock zygotes[J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 12: 648482.
[7] Liu Q, Wang C, Jiao X Z, et al.2019. Hi-TOM: A platform for high-throughput tracking of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas systems[J]. Science China. Life Sciences, 62(1): 1-7.
[8] Mahdi A K, Medrano J F, Ross P J.2022. Single-step genome editing of small ruminant embryos by electroporation[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(18): 10218.
[9] Maruyama T, Dougan S K, Truttmann M C, et al.2015. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 33(5): 538-542.
[10] Modzelewski A J, Chen S, Willis B J, et al.2018. Efficient mouse genome engineering by CRISPR-EZ technology[J]. Nature Protocols, 13(6): 1253-1274.
[11] Montgomery G W, Galloway S M, Davis G H, et al.2001. Genes controlling ovulation rate in sheep[J]. Reproduction, 121: 843-852.
[12] Mulsant P, Lecerf F, Fabre S, et al.2001. Mutation in bone morphogenetic protein receptor-IB is associated with increased ovulation rate in Booroola Merino ewes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 98: 5104-5109.
[13] Namula Z, Wittayarat M, Hirata M, et al.2019. Genome mutation after the introduction of the gene editing by electroporation of Cas9 protein (GEEP) system into bovine putative zygotes[J]. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Animal, 55: 598-603.
[14] Nishio K, Tanihara F, Nguyen T V, et al.2018. Effects of voltage strength during electroporation on the development and quality of in vitro-produced porcine embryos[J]. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 53: 313-318.
[15] Pi W H, Feng G Y, Liu M H, et al.2024. Electroporation delivery of Cas9 sgRNA ribonucleoprotein-mediated genome editing in sheep IVF zygotes[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(17): 9145.
[16] Piñeiro-Silva C, Gadea J.2024. Optimizing oocyte electroporation for genetic modification of porcine embryos: Evaluation of the parthenogenetic activation[J]. Theriogenology, 218: 126-136.
[17] Qin W, Dion S L, Kutny P M, et al.2015. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in mice by zygote electroporation of nuclease[J]. Genetics, 200: 423-430.
[18] Reader K L, Haydon L J, Littlejohn R P, et al.2012. Booroola BMPR1B mutation alters early follicular development and oocyte ultrastructure in sheep[J]. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 24: 353-361.
[19] Renaud J B, Boix C, Charpentier M, et al.2016. Improved genome editing efficiency and flexibility using modified oligonucleotides with TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases[J]. Cell Reports, 14(9): 2263-2272.
[20] Takemoto T.2020. Zygote electroporation for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery to generate genetically modified mice[J]. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2050: 121-126.
[21] Vilarino M, Rashid S T, Suchy F P, et al.2017. CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection in oocytes disables pancreas development in sheep[J]. Scientific Reports, 7: 17472.
[22] Ward F, Enright B, Rizos D, et al.2002. Optimization of in vitro bovine embryo production: Effect of duration of maturation, length of gamete co-incubation, sperm concentration and sire[J]. Theriogenology, 57: 2105-2117.
[23] Wilson T, Wu X Y, Juengel J L, et al.2001. Highly prolific Booroola sheep have a mutation in the intracellular kinase domain of bone morphogenetic protein IB receptor (ALK-6) that is expressed in both oocytes and granulosa cells[J]. Biology of Reproduction, 64: 1225-1235.
[24] Zhou S W, Ding Y G, Liu J, et al.2020. Highly efficient generation of sheep with a defined FecBB mutation via adenine base editing[J]. Genetics, Selection, Evolution, 52(1): 35.
[25] Zhou S W, Lenk L J, Gao Y W, et al.2023. Generation of sheep with defined FecBB and TBXT mutations and porcine blastocysts with KCNJ5G151R/+ mutation using prime editing[J]. BMC Genomics, 24(1): 313.
[26] Zhou S W, Yu H H, Zhao X E, et al.2018. Generation of gene edited sheep with a defined Booroola fecundity gene (FecBB) mutation in bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B (BMPR1B) via clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated Cas9[J]. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 30: 1616-1621 |
|
|
|
