|
|
|
| Morphological Characters and ISSR Analyses of M2 Generation of the Sophora davidii Mutants Induced by Radiation |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Radiation mutation breeding has the characteristics of high frequency of mutation, large variation range and short breeding period, which is one of the main methods of breeding. In order to speed up the work, the previous study used 60Co-γ rays to irradiate Sophora davidii germplasm with the best production performance and carry out radiation mutation breeding. In this study, the variation in twelve M2 mutant populations of S. davidii which were induced by 60Co-γ radiation was evaluated by morphological characters and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. The results showed that compared with the control without radiation, the mutants were characterized with the increase or decrease of plant height and crown diameter, the significant increase of stem diameter, leaf length, leaf width and leaf area, and the reduction of the branch site height. The coefficient of variation of 8 phenotypic traits were between 19.72% and 55.46%. The degree of variation of each index was branching site height (55.46%)＞ plant height (53.24%)＞ crown diameter (47.91%)＞ leaf area (38.30%)＞ number of branches (36.84%)＞ stem diameter (36.10%)＞ leaf width (23.60%)＞ leaf length (19.72%). A total of 141 amplified loci were detected by 20 ISSR primers, of which 75 were polymorphic, and the polymorphic rate (PPR) was up to 53.2%. The Nei's genetic diversity (He) and Shannon's information index (I) were 0.248 3 and 0.377 9, respectively. The genetic similarity index based on ISSR data between the mutants ranged from 0.627 7 to 0.839 4, with a mean of 0.733 6. All mutants were clustered into 4 groups based on the morphological characters or the ISSR molecular markers, but the clustering results between two levels were not fully consistent. This study provides a scientific foundation and germplasms for further radiation breeding of S. davidii.
|
|
Received: 18 January 2018
Published: 26 September 2018
|
| Fund:The National Natural Science Foundation of China |
|
|
|
| [1]Badr A，Elshazly H H，Ahmed H I S，et al．.Genetic diversity of achillea fragrantissima in egypt inferred from phenotypic variations and ISSR markers associated with traits of plant size and seed yield[J].Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 1:1-9
[2]范金.60Co-γ射线辐射下紫花苜蓿耐盐突变体的筛选和ISSR分析[J].硕士学位论文, 2015, :22-23
[3]方智振，叶新福，周丹蓉，等.辐射三月李红肉迟熟突变体的ISSR分析[J].核农学报, 2016, 30(2):209-215
[4]黄桂丹.60Co-γ射线辐射育种研究进展[J].林业与环境科学, 2016, 32(2):107-111
[5]雷文英，赵丽丽，简忠领，等.白刺花染色体压片技术优化及核型分析[J].种子, 2017, 36(8):5-9
[6]李凤涛，赵丽丽，王普昶，等.辐射白刺花遗传多样性的ISSR和RAPD比较分析[J].草地学报, 2015, 23(5):1114-1118
[7]李凤涛.60Co-γ辐射对白刺花诱变效应研究[J].硕士论文, 2015, :39-40
[8]刘长命，张显，徐晴，等.辐射诱发唐菖蒲复色花突变体的AFLP分析[J].西北植物学报, 2009, 29(1):69-74
[9]刘华荣，龙忠富，张莉，等.不同添加剂对晴隆白刺花青贮品质和营养价值的影响[J].贵州畜牧兽医, 2014, 38(4):5-9
[10]刘平平，叶开玉，龚弘娟，等.猕猴桃60Co-γ射线辐射诱变植株变异的ISSR分子标记研究[J].西南农业学报, 2016, 29(10):2457-2462
[11]龙忠富，侯扶江，张建波.贵州野生白刺花种质资源AFLP遗传多样性研究[J].中国草地学报, 2017, 39(2):105-110
[12]陆艳婷，陈金跃，张小明，等.浙江省水稻辐射育种研究进展[J].核农学报, 2017, 31(8):1500-1508
[13]Maluszynski M.Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement[J].Euphytica, 1995, 85:303-315
[14]潘存祥，许勇，纪海波，等.西瓜种质资源表型多样性及聚类分析[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(1):59-63
[15]Tai Z，Cai L，Dai L，et al.Antioxidant activity and chemical constituents of edible flower of Sophora viciifolia[J].Food Chemistry, 2011, 126(4):1648-1654
[16]Tshilengelukanda L，Kalonjimbuyi A，Nkongolo K K C，et al.Effect of gamma irradiation on morpho-agronomic characteristics of groundnut (L.)[J].American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2013, 4(11):2186-2192
[17]王慧慧，王普昶，赵钢，等.干旱胁迫下白刺花种子大小与萌发对策[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(2):335-341
[18]Wang P C，Zhang Y，Zhao L L，et al.Effect of gamma rays on Sophora davidii and detection of DNA polymorphism through ISSR marker[J].BioMed Research International, 2017, 34:1-6
[19]王雨欣，张萍华，吴佳炳，等.一个水稻浅绿叶突变体的表型鉴定与遗传分析[J].杂交水稻, 2016, 31(4):71-74
[20]吴潇，齐开杰，殷豪，等.诱变技术在落叶果树育种中的应用[J].园艺学报, 2016, 43(9):1633-1652
[21]薛云云.60Co诱变(晋大78)后代遗传性状变异分析[J].硕士学位论文, 2013, :31-32
[22]杨敬敏，黄苏珍，杨永恒.60Co-γ和离子束注入对甜菊杂交后代种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报, 2013, 22(2):52-58
[23]杨凯敏，李贵全，郭数进，等.60Co诱变大豆后代表型性状的研究[J].天津农业科学, 2014, 20(10):5-9
[24]杨兆民，张璐.辐射诱变技术在农业育种中的应用与探析[J].基因组学与应用生物学, 2011, 30(1):87-91
[25]张德建，梁发茂，胡刚，等.γ射线辐射“9311”水稻突变体的筛选[J].植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(4):876-882
[26]赵丽丽，王普昶，陈超，等.外源钙对干旱胁迫下岩溶山区白刺花幼苗生长、生理特性的影响[J].核农学报, 2017, 31(10):2039-2046
[27]赵宁，杨孟莉，李继东，等.基于ISSR标记的山茱萸核心种质构建[J].农业生物技术学报, 2017, 25(4):579-587
[28]张金汕，董庆国，胡艳红，等.60Co-γ射线辐射对大麦后代性状和β-葡聚糖含量的影响[J].新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(12):2180-2186
|
|
|
|
