|
|
Molecular Characterization and Protein Expression Vector Construction of African swine fever virus MGF505-5R Gene |
SHEN Zhao-Ji1, XIE Chun-Di2, SHAGAINAR Jurmt2, GUO Xiao-Rong1, ZHOU Rong2*, LI Kui2 |
1 School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, Foshan 528225, China;
2 Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China |
|
|
Abstract African swine fever (ASF), a devastating disease for pigs (Sus scrofa), usually causes hemorrhagic fever, which bring great economic losses to the pig industry. Multigene families (MGF) 505-5R was in the right variable region (RVR) of the African swine fever virus (ASFV) genome and could influence the virulence of the virus. The work aimed to analyze the molecular characteristics of the MGF505-5R gene and protein and construct a eukaryotic expression vector for the ASFV MGF505-5R gene. The MGF505-5R gene was obtained from the ASFV reference genome in GenBank (GenBank No. MK128995.1) for bioinformatics analysis, and the MGF505-5R gene was synthesized. The MGF505-5R gene was ligated into the pRK5M-C-2×Strep vector by homologous recombination. The recombinant plasmid pRK5M-C-2×Strep-MGF505-5R was transfected into IPEC-J2 cells after being identified by PCR and sequencing, and the expression of the MGF505-5R gene was confirmed by immunofluorescence and Western blot. Transcript levels of exosome 8 subunits, Mtr4 exosome RNA helicase (MTREX), terminal nucleotidyltransferase 4A (TENT4A) and zinc finger DHHC-type palmitoyltransferase 16 (ZDHHC16) in IPEC-J2 cells overexpressing pRK5M-C-2×Strep-MGF505-5R were detected by qPCR. Bioinformatics analysis showed that the MGF505-5R gene was divided into 3 branches in the phylogenetic tree and there was a positive selection at amino acids 20, 105 and 485. The secondary structure of MGF505-5R protein matched the tertiary structure, and the positive selection sites were all located on the irregularly coiling. PCR results showed that the MGF505-5R gene fragment was successfully ligated into the pRK5M-C-2×Strep vector. Immunofluorescence and Western blot assays showed that the pRK5M-C-2×Strep-MGF505-5R vector was successfully expressed in porcine intestinal columnar epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) cells. The qPCR results showed that the expression of exocytotic complex subunits exosome component (EXOSC) 1, EXOSC2, EXOSC3, EXOSC4, EXOSC5, EXOSC7, EXOSC8, EXOSC10, TENT4A and ZDHHC16 was extremely significantly decreased in IPEC-J2 cells overexpressing pRK5M-C-2×Strep-MGF505-5R (P<0.01); no significant change in MTREX expression. The analysis of the molecular characteristics of MGF505-5R in this study provided a basis for the evolutionary study of this gene; the construction of the MGF505-5R expression vector in pig IPEC-J2 cells provides the effective tool and experimental material for the study of protein interactions between ASFV and the host.
|
Received: 14 March 2022
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
*zhourong03@caas.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] 王潇, 郭娜娜. 2021. 非洲猪瘟疫情防控新形势下实现生猪稳产保供的对策及建议[J]. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 51(10): 10-12; 15.
(Wang X, Guo N N. 2021. Countermeasures and suggestions to achieve stable pig production and supply under the new situation of African swine fever prevention and control[J]. Gansu Veterinary Animal Husbandry, 51(10): 10-12; 15.)
[2] 杨敏, 韩玉珍. 2015. 真核生物核酸外切体(exosome)的研究进展[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 42(02): 140-146.
(Yang M, Han Y Z. 2015. Research advance of the exosome in eukaryotes[J]. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics, 42(2): 140-146.)
[3] 张艳艳, 陈腾, 张静远, 等. 2019. 非洲猪瘟病毒基因缺失疫苗株的构建和免疫保护特性[J]. 中国兽医学报, 39(08): 1421-1427.
(Zhang Y Y, Chen T, Zhang J Y, et al. 2019. Construction and immunoprotective properties of a gene-deficient vaccine strain of African swine fever virus[J]. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 39(08): 1421-1427.)
[4] Afonso C L, Piccone M E, Zaffuto K M, et al. 2004. African swine fever virus multigene family 360 and 530 genes affect host interferon response[J]. Journal of Virology, 78(4): 1858-1864.
[5] Chapman D A G, Tcherepanov V, Upton C, et al. 2008. Comparison of the genome sequences of non-pathogenic and pathogenic African swine fever virus isolates[J]. Journal of General Virology, 89(Pt 2): 397-408.
[6] Contreras X, Salifou K, Sanchez G, et al. 2018. Nuclear RNA surveillance complexes silence HIV-1 transcription[J]. PLoS Pathogens, 14(3): e1006950.
[7] Costard S, Mur L, Lubroth J, et al. 2013. Epidemiology of African swine fever virus[J]. Virus Research, 173(1): 191-197.
[8] Dixon L K, Chapman D A, Netherton C L, et al. 2013. African swine fever virus replication and genomics[J]. Virus Research, 173(1): 3-14.
[9] Freitas F B, Frouco G, Martins C, et al. 2019. The QP509L and Q706L superfamily Ⅱ RNA helicases of African swine fever virus are required for viral replication, having non-redundant activities[J]. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 8(1): 291-302.
[10] Goatley L C, Reis A L, Portugal R, et al. 2020. A pool of eight virally vectored african swine fever antigens protect pigs against fatal disease[J]. Vaccines (Basel), 8(2): 234.
[11] Golding J P, Goatley L, Goodbourn S, et al. 2016. Sensitivity of African swine fever virus to type I interferon is linked to genes within multigene families 360 and 505[J]. Virology, 493: 154-161.
[12] Haresnape J M, Wilkinson P J. 1989. A study of African swine fever virus infected ticks (Ornithodoros moubata) collected from three villages in the ASF enzootic area of Malawi following an outbreak of the disease in domestic pigs[J]. Epidemiol Infect, 102(3): 507-522.
[13] Keßler C, Forth J H, Keil G M, et al. 2018. The intracellular proteome of African swine fever virus[J]. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 14714.
[14] Molleston J M, Sabin L R, Moy R H, et al. 2016. A conserved virus-induced cytoplasmic TRAMP-like complex recruits the exosome to target viral RNA for degradation[J]. Genes & Development, 30(14): 1658-1670.
[15] O'Donnell V, Holinka L G, Gladue D P, et al. 2015. African swine fever virus georgia isolate harboring deletions of MGF360 and MGF505 genes is attenuated in swine and confers protection against challenge with virulent parental virus[J]. Journal of Virology, 89(11): 6048-6056.
[16] Portugal R, Coelho J, Höper D, et al. 2015. Related strains of African swine fever virus with different virulence: Genome comparison and analysis[J]. Journal of General Virology, 96(Pt 2): 408-419.
[17] Puno M R, Weick E M, Das M, et al. 2019. SnapShot: The RNA Exosome[J]. Cell, 179(1): 282-282.e281.
[18] Rathakrishnan A, Connell S, Petrovan V, et al. 2022. Differential effect of deleting members of African swine fever virus multigene families 360 and 505 from the genotypeⅡ georgia 2007/1 isolate on virus replication, virulence, and induction of protection[J]. Journal of Virology, 96(6): e0189921.
[19] Rialdi A, Hultquist J, Jimenez-Morales D, et al. 2017. The RNA exosome syncs IAV-RNAP Ⅱ transcription to promote viral ribogenesis and infectivity[J]. Cell, 169(4): 679-692.
[20] Rodriguez J M, Yañez R J, Pan R, et al. 1994. Multigene families in African swine fever virus: Family 505[J]. Journal of Virology, 68(4): 2746-2751.
[21] Sánchez-Cordón P J, Jabbar T, Berrezaie M, et al. 2018. Evaluation of protection induced by immunisation of domestic pigs with deletion mutant African swine fever virus BeninΔMGF by different doses and routes[J]. Vaccine, 36(5): 707-715.
[22] Sun E, Huang L, Zhang X, et al. 2021. Genotype I African swine fever viruses emerged in domestic pigs in China and caused chronic infection[J]. Emerging Microbes & Infections, 10(1): 2183-2193.
[23] Sun M, Yu S, Ge H, et al. 2022. The A137R protein of African swine fever virus inhibits type Ⅰ interferon production via the autophagy-mediated lysosomal degradation of TBK1[J]. Journal of Virology: e0195721.
[24] Zhu Z, Chen H, Liu L, et al. 2021. Classification and characterization of multigene family proteins of African swine fever viruses[J]. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(4): bbaa380.
[25] Zsak L, Lu Z, Burrage T G, et al. 2001. African swine fever vi- rus multigene family 360 and 530 genes are novel macrophage host range determinants[J]. Journal of Virology, 75(7): 3066-3076. |
|
|
|