|
|
|
| Establishment of Multiplex Real-time fluorescence PCR for Detection of Mink (Mustela lutreola), Pig (Sus scrofa) and Rat (Mus musculus) Derived Components in Beef and Mutton |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Abstract At present, events about meat adulteration were common occurred, for example, mix fox flesh to cooked donkey flesh in Wal-Mart and horsemeat event spreading EU countries. Now, the method of meat adulteration has been adulterated by one ingredient to a mixture of ingredients. This kind of fraud disturbs the market order seriously. Countries have paid more and more attention to meat adulteration, the identification and traceability of meat adulteration analysis become a hot topic on the world. Traditional meat identification was authenticate the meat appearance, color, odour, falvor and hardness by vision, touch, smell and taste, these methods cannot meet the needs of meat quality and source authentication now. In recent years, with the development of modern analytical instrumentation and biotechnology, identification techniques for meat adulteration have also been well developed. Including protein-based detection methods, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods, chromatography analysis methods and DNA-based detection methods. Protein-based detection methods can detect quantitatively, but it is not suit for animal origin analysis. Many ELISA kits have already been commercially developed, but their application is limited due to protein activity. DNA-based detection methods have the characteristic of simple, short detection time and accurate, of them, fluorescence PCR detection method has the advantage of high sensitivity, high specificity and high throughput, it will become the future direction of the meat source identification. Multiple fluorescence qPCR was used in this experiment. In order to identify the 3 ingredients of mink source, porcine source and rat source in mutton and beef, a pair of universal primers were designed based on the mitochondrial 16S rDNA conserved region of the 3 different animals and 3 kinds of species-specific molecular beacon probes with strong specificity were designed based on the mitochondrial 16S rDNA of mustela vison, sus scrofa and mus musculus. The specific verification of the 3 probes, the sensitivity verification of the experimental system and the test of the detection limit of the samples were carried out respectively in this experiment. In the sensitivity verification experiment, the 3 probes can effectively eliminate the interference of DNA from other species and specifically amplified in both monoplex fluorescence qPCR and multiplex fluorescence qPCR systems. In the sensitivity verification of experiment, seven dilution gradients of DNA concentration were set up and 6 parallel samples for each gradient, it was determined that the sensitivity of the system was 0.01 ng/μL. In the test of the detection limit of samples, 3 kind of doping methods were set up, 7 different dopant mass ratios were set up in each doping method and 4 parallel samples for each dopant mass ratio, the sensitivity of the test was determined to be 1% (mass ratio). This method provides a scientific basis for the origin identification of multi species, puts forward a new way to control the authenticity of animal raw material sources, and provides powerful technical reference for enterprise supervision to rectify the mess of meat industry.
|
|
Received: 21 November 2017
Published: 06 August 2018
|
|
|
|
| [1]范丽丽，李培，傅春玲，等.食品中鸡源性成分实时荧光PCR检测方法的建立[J].食品科学, 2014, 35(2):248-251[2]侯东军，韩合敬，郝智慧，等.双重荧光PCR法快速检测饲料中牛羊源成分[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016, 2016(2):247-250[3]黄伟，杨秀娟，张燕鸣，等. 近红外光谱技术在肉类定性鉴别中的研究进展[J].肉类研究, 2014, 28(1):31-34[4]李林，陈继明，王志亮.Real-time PCR和常规PCR方法快速鉴定肉骨粉中的牛源性成份[J].中国预防兽医学报, 2005, 27(1):50-54[5]李通，尹艳，王海，等. 聚合酶链式反应快速鉴别5种常见肉类别[J].食品科学, 2013, 34(8):249-252[6]马永征，马冬，白娣斯，等.免疫学检测肉类制品掺假研究进展[J].肉类研究, 2012, 26(9):26-29[7]任君安，黄文胜，葛毅强，等.肉制品真伪鉴别技术研究进展[J].食品科学, 2016, 37(1):247-257[8]苏葳艺，李欣南，于雷，等.利用多重PCR方法检测牛肉中的掺假肉[J].食品工业, 2015, 36(2):277-280[9]王金斌，李文，白蓝，等.基于核酸分子学方法的肉类成分鉴别技术研究进展[J].食品科学, 2017, 38(11):318-327[10]王珊，李志娟，苗丽，等.微滴式数字PCR与实时荧光PCR检测羊肉制品中羊源和猪源性成分方法的比较[J].肉类工业, 2015, 2015(7):38-41[11]王守云，袁明美，封聪，等.肉类掺假鉴别技术研究进展[J].肉类研究, 2017, 31(4):56-61[12]徐琼，张奕南，顾文佳，等.TaqMan实时荧光PCR法定量检测生肉中猪源性成分的建立[J].食品科技, 2016, 41(2):309-313[13]张小莉，魏玲，李宝明，等.肉制品掺假鉴别技术研究进展[J].食品安全质量检测学报, 2014, 5(10):3190-3196[14]Ding H B, Xu R J.Near-infrared spectroscopic technique for detection of beef hamburger adulteration[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2000, 48(6):2193-2193[15]Engling F P, Jorgensen J S, Paradiesseverin I, et al.Evidence of Animal Meal in Feeds[J].Kraftfutter/Feed magazine, 2000, 2000(1):14-17[16]Al-Jowder O, Kemsley E K, Wilson R H.Detection of Adulteration in Cooked Meat Products by Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(6):1325-1329 |
|
|
|
