|
|
Dominant Strain Screening of Mycoplasma bovis in Biofilm Formation and Optimization of Cultural Conditions |
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
|
|
Abstract Abstract Mycoplasma bovis (Mb) is an important pathogenic mycoplasma of cattle (Bos taurus). The biofilm formation of Mb can cause persistent infection in host cells and cause great economic loss to cattle industry. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to screen a dominant strain of Mb biofilm formation by identifying the biofilm formation ability of different Mb strains, and then optimize the cultural conditions on biofilm formation of Mb. First of all, the ability of biofilm formation of Mb PG45 strain, Hubei (HB) strain, Wuwei (WW) strain, Dingxi (DX) strain, and Lintao (LT) strain were identified by polystyrene microtiter plate assay, and then the strain with strong biofilm forming ability was used as the model strain to optimize the culture conditions of Mb biofilm formation. The results showed that the ability of biofilm formation was different among different strains of Mb, among which the biofilm formation ability of LT strain was the strongest, the next was HB strain. And the biofilm formation ability of PG45 strain, WW strain and DX strain was the weakest. The optimal cultural conditions for biofilm formation of Mb was that the Mb cultures (1.7E+08 CFU/mL) were inoculated at a dilution of 1∶10 into the Eaton medium containing 0.01 mg/mL fish sperm DNA, 20% serum of horse, 1% glucose and final pH 8.5, and then incubated at 37 ℃, with 5% CO2 for 72 h. Under the optimal cultural conditions, the biofilm formation ability of LT strain was sound. In this study, a dominant strain of Mb biofilm formation was obtained, and a stable and obvious biofilm was formed by optimizing the cultural conditions, which will provide excellent biomaterials for biofilm related study of Mb.
|
Received: 04 April 2018
Published: 20 July 2018
|
|
|
|
参考文献段韵涵, 韩北忠, 杨葆华, 等. 2008. 培养条件对金黄色葡萄球菌生物被膜生长的影响[J]. 中国酿造, (3): 0017-0020.(Duan Y H, Han B Z, Yang B H, et al. 2008. Effect of cultivation on grown of staphylococcus aureus biofilms[J]. China Brewing, (3): 0017-0020.)邓旗, 孙力军, 王雅玲, 等. 2013. 环境条件对腐败瓦氏菌生物被膜形成能力的影响[J]. 中国食品学报, 13(10): 43-50. (Deng Q, Sun L J, Wang Y L, et al. 2013. The effect of different environment conditions on the ability of Shewanella Putrefaciens biofilm formation[J]. 13(10): 43-50.)胡长敏, 石磊, 龚瑞, 等. 2009. 牛支原体病研究进展[J]. 动物医学进展, 2009, 30(8): 73-77. (Hu C M, Shi L, Gong R, et al. 2009. Progress on Bovine Mycoplasmosis[J]. Progress in Veterinary Medicine, 30(8): 73-77.渠宏雁, 孟良玉, 刘锦峰, 等. 2013. 副溶血性弧菌生物被膜的形成及优化[J]. 中国食品学报, 19(9): 56-61. (Qu H Y, Meng L L, Liu J F, et al. 2013. Research on the Formation and Optimization of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Biofilm. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 19(9): 56-61.)温绍霞, 孙竞. 2014. 细菌生物膜形成及相关耐药性治疗研究进展[J]. 海南医学, 6(9): 1331-1333. (Weng S X, Sun J. 2014. Research progress on bacterial biofilm and related drug resistance therapy[J]. Hainan Medicine, 6(9): 1331-1333.)王云英, 张丽萍. 2009. 肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜对小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞TLRs受体表达的影响[J]. 中国微生态学杂志, 21(9): 784-787. (Wang Y Y, Zhang L P. 2009. Influence of Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm on expression of Toll like receptor in mouse peritoneal macrophage[J]. Chinese Journal of Microecology, 21(9):782-787.) 辛九庆, 李媛, 郭丹, 等. 2008. 国内首次从患肺炎的犊牛肺脏中分离到牛支原体[J]. 中国预防兽医学报, 30(9): 661-664. (Xin J Q, Li Y, Guo D, et al. 2008. First isolation of Mycoplasma bovis from calf lung with pneumoniae in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 30(9): 661-664. Burki S, Frey J, Polo P. 2015. Virulence, persistence and dissemination of Mycoplasma bovis[J]. Veterinary Microbiol, 179(1-2): 15-22.Branda S S, Vik S, Friedman L, et al. 2005. Biofilms: the matrix revisited[J]. Trends Microbiology, 13: 20-26.Chicurel M. 2000. Bacterial biofilm and infections. Slimebusters[J]. Nature, 408(6810): 284-286.Costeron JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. 1999. Bacterial biofilms:a common cause of persistent infections[J]. Science, 284(1/2): 1318-1322,Clutterbuck A L, Woods E J, Knottenbelt D C, et al. 2007. Biofilms and their relevance to veterinary medicine[J]. Veterinary Microbiol, 121(1-2): 1-17.Fitzgerald S D, Kaneene J B, Butler K L, et al. 2000. Comparison of postmortem techniques for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis in white-tailed deer[J]. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 12(4): 322-327.Gilbert P, Allison D G, Mcbain A J. 2002. Biofilm in vitro and in vivo: do singular mechanisms imply cross-resistence?[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92(31): 98S-110S.Ganjali D M, Abdeshahian P, Sudesh K, et al. 2016. Optimization of Salmonella Typhi biofilm assay on polypropylene microtiter plates using response surface methodology[J]. Biofouling, 32(4): 477-487.Garcia-Castillo M, Morosini M I, Galvez M, et al. 2008. Differences in biofilm development and antibiotic susceptibility among clinical Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum isolate[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 62(5): 1027-1030.Hale H H, Helmboldt C F, Plastridge W N, et al. 1962. Bovine mastitis caused by a Mycoplasma species[J]. The Cornell Veterinarian, 52(4): 582-591.Houdt R V, Michiels C W. 2005. Role of bacterial cell surface structures in Escherichia coli biofilm formation[J]. Research in Microbiology, 156: 626-633.Johnson L R. 2008. Microcolony and biofilm formation as a survival strategy for bacterial[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 251(1): 24-34.Mcauliffe L, Ayling RD, Ellis RJ,et al. 2008. Biofilm-grown Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides SC exhibit both phenotypic and genotypic variation compared with planktonic cells[J]. Veterinary Microbiol, 129(3-4): 315-324. Mcauliffe L, Ellis RJ, Miles K, et al. 2006. Biofilm formation by mycoplasma species and its role inenvironmental persistence and survival[J]. Microbiology, 152(4): 913-922.Pfutzner H, Sachse K. 1996. Mycoplasma bovis as an agent of mastitis, pneumonia, arthritis and genital disorders in cattle[J]. Revue scientifique et technique, 15(4): 1477-1494.Simmons W L, Dybvig K. 2007. Biofilms protect Mycoplasma pulmonis cells from lytic effects of complement and Gramicidin[J]. Infect and Immunity, 75(8): 3696-3699. |
|
|
|