|
|
|
| Analysis of Differential Proteomics in Duck (Anas platyrhynchos domestica) Embryonic Liver of Helped and Normally Breaking Eggs |
| 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) combined with mass spectrum identification and bioinformatics were applied in this study to analyze the molecular mechanisms of weak embryos of duck (Anas platyrhynchos domestica), and select differentially expressed proteins that could be used in promoting hatchability. All 136 differentially expressed proteins were identified, and 76 proteins were significantly up-regulated and 60 proteins were significantly down-regulated in helped breaking eggs compared with that in normally hatching eggs. Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analyses showed that the most of the differentially expressed proteins were related to glucose metabolism, oxygen transport, stress response, redox reaction and cytoskeleton. Four enzymes in glycolysis, three enzymes in cellular respiration pathways were significantly up-regulated (P＜0.05), and 7 proteins in actin filament dynamic process were up-regulated, whereas 3 hemoglobins in oxygen transport and 3 heat shock proteins in stress response were significantly down-regulated (P＜0.05) in helped breaking eggs compared with normally hatching eggs. The qRT-PCR was used for verifying the mRNA expression of cytoplasmic aconitate hydratase (ACO1), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B (ALDOB), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 (G3P1) and heat shock cognate 71 kD protein (HSPA8). Only the expression level of ACO1 were consistent in mRNA and protein. The results indicated that weak embryo might be related to glycometabolism, respiratory metabolism and some other biological processes, and there was lower energy metabolism in helped breaking eggs. This study provides theoretical basis of proteomics for molecular mechanism of weak embryos in duck.
|
|
Received: 14 March 2016
Published: 22 July 2016
|
|
|
|
| [1] Hassan GM, Nordskog AW.Effects of egg size and heterozygosis on embryonic growth and hatching speed [J]. Genetics, 67(2): 279-285.[2] Schaal T, Cherian G. A survey of the hatchability of broiler and turkey eggs in the United States from 1985 through 2005 [J]. Poultry Science, 2007.86(3): 598-600.[3] Hodgetts B. 1991. Current hatchabilities in species of domestic importance and the scope for improvement [J]. Avian incubation, 139 –144.[4] Harun M, Veeneklaas R, Visser G, et al. 2001. Artificial incubation of Muscovy duck eggs: why some eggs hatch and others do not [J]. Poultry Science, 80(2): 219-224.[5] Wu WW, Wang G, Baek SJ, et al. 2006. Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel- or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF [J]. Journal Proteome Research, 5(3): 651-658.[6] Bjonnes PO, Aulie A, Hoiby M. 1987. Effects of hypoxia on the metabolism of embryos and chicks of domestic fowl [J]. Journal of Experimental Zoology Supplement, 1: 209-212.[7] Hochachka PW, Buck LT, Doll CJ, et al. 1996. Unifying theory of hypoxia tolerance: molecular/metabolic defense and rescue mechanisms for surviving oxygen lack [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(18): 9493-9498.[8] Ramirez JM, Folkow LP, Blix AS. 2007. Hypoxia tolerance in mammals and birds: from the wilderness to the clinic [J]. Annual Review of Physiology, 69: 113-143.[9] Trybus KM. 2008. Myosin V from head to tail [J]. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 65(9): 1378-1389.[10] Pastural E, Barrat FJ, Dufourcq-Lagelouse R, et al. 1997.Griscelli disease maps to chromosome 15q21 and is associated with mutations in the myosin-Va gene [J]. Nature Genetics, 16(3): 289-292.[11] Bobkov AA, Muhlrad A, Shvetsov A, et al. 2004. Cofilin (ADF) affects lateral contacts in F-actin [J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 337(1): 93-104.[12] Sarmiere PD, Bamburg JR. 2004.Regulation of the neuronal actin cytoskeleton by ADF/cofilin [J]. Journal of Neurobiology, 58(1): 103-117.[13] Hansen JJ, Bross P, Westergaard M, et al. 2003. Genomic structure of the human mitochondrial chaperonin genes: HSP60 and HSP10 are localised head to head on chromosome 2 separated by a bidirectional promoter [J]. Human Genetics, 112(1): 71-77.[14] Lin KM, Lin B, Lian IY, et al. 2001. Combined and individual mitochondrial HSP60 and HSP10 expression in cardiac myocytes protects mitochondrial function and prevents apoptotic cell deaths induced by simulated ischemia-reoxygenation [J]. Circulation, 103(13): 1787-1792.[15] Rao RV, Ellerby HM, Bredesen DE. 2004. Coupling endoplasmic reticulum stress to the cell death program [J][J]., 1971, 11((4)): 372-380 |
|
|
|
