|
|
|
| Efficient Knockout of lncRNA Promoter Region by CRISPR/Cas9 System in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) |
| 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Nondret002679 gene is a type of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) in zebrafish (Danio rerio) homologous to the LNC-PHOX2B-2 gene of large intergenic noncoding RNA 682 (lincRNA) in human (Homo sapiens), which is related to tumor and might be silenced by deleting the nucleotide sequences within its promoter region through clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR- associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system, to facilitate its function research. In the present study, the sequence positioned upstream and downstream region of its predicted promoter were used to design guide RNA (gRNA) to target its promoter region. There were 6 gRNAs located in either upstream or downstream promoter region, named as gR1, gR2, gR3, gR4, gR5 and gR6, respectively, were designed. These gRNAs were synthesized by in vitro transcription with the templates, which were made with 3 oligonucleotides by overlap PCR, a rapid method to obtain sufficient templates for gRNA. The 6 gRNAs and Cas9 mRNA were transcribed using transcription Kit and purified by LiCl precipitation and redissolved in RNase-free water. To knock out the sequences located in the predicted promoter of the lncRNA gene, a mixture of these gRNAs and Cas9 mRNA were microinjected into each zebrafish embryo at the one-cell stage with 1.76 nL. The concentration of each gRNA in injection solution was approximately 12.5 ng/μL, which also contained 300 ng/μL of Cas9 mRNA and 0.5% phenol red. Regular PCR with sequence-specific primers were used to identify individual knockout zebrafish with a deletion in the promoter region, showing a 3 643 bp PCR product in wild type zebrafish and 579~1 664 bp PCR products range in promoter deleted zebrafish. Twenty eight 2-month-old injected zebrafishes were extracted genomic DNA of their fin for PCR, out of which 11 were identified 579~1 664 bp PCR fragments range. Sequencing results, when compared to NCBI databases, demonstrated that 11 zebrafishes occurred deletion in lncRNA promoter region with 39% of knockout efficiency. The length of deletion fragments in 11 zebrafishes ranged of 1.9~3.1 kb. In addition, 33 F1 zebrafishes obtained from the breeding of one female and one male adult founders with heterozygous deletion were screened by PCR for deletion in the promoter region. The result indicated that the 6 F1 zebrafishes had promoter deletion with fragment range of 579~1 664 bp, which occurred homozygous deletion in lncRNA promoter in 3 zebrafishes. The result indicated that CRISPR/Cas9 system was an efficient approach to delete lncRNA gene promoter, which provides basic data for function study of Nondret002679 gene.
|
|
Received: 09 November 2015
Published: 01 April 2016
|
|
|
|
| [1]Amaral PP, Dinger ME, Mercer TR, et al. 2008. The Eukaryotic Genome as an RNA Machine[J].Science,319(5871): 1787-1789.[2]Bedell VM, Wang Y, Campbell JM, et al. 2012. In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system[J]. Nature, 491(7422): 114-118.[3]Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, et al. 2013. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 31(3): 230-232.[4]Ding Q, Regan SN, Xia Y, et al. 2013. Enhanced efficiency of human pluripotent stem cell genome editing through replacing TALENs with CRISPRs[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 12(4):393-394.[5]Fatica A and Bozzoni I. 2014. Long non-coding RNAs: new players in cell differentiation and development[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics. 15(1): 7-21.[6]Fujii W, Kawasaki K, Sugiura K, et al. 2013. Efficient generation of large-scale genome-modified mice using gRNA and CAS9 endonuclease[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(20): e187. [7]Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, et al. 2013. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome[J]. Nature, 496(7446): 498-503.[8]Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, et al. 2013. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 31(3): 227-229.[9]Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. 2012. A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity[J]. Science, 337(6096): 816-821.[10]Kim HJ, Lee HJ, Kim H, et al. 2009. Targeted genome editing in human cells with zinc finger nucleases constructed via modular assembly[J]. Genome Research, 19｜(7): 1279-1288.[11]Le Provost F, Lillico S, Passet B, et al. 2010. Zinc finger nuclease technology heralds a new era in mammalian transgenesis[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 28(3): 134-141.[12]Oost Jvd. 2013. New Tool for Genome Surgery[J]. Science, 339(6121): 768-770.[13]Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. 2009. Evolution and Functions of Long Noncoding RNAs[J]. Cell, 136(4): 629-641.[14]Spizzo R, Almeida MI, Colombatti A, et al. 2012. Long non-coding RNAs and cancer: a new frontier of translational research [J]. Oncogene, 31(43): 4577-4587.[15]Wapinski O and Chang HY. 2011. Long noncoding RNAs and human disease[J]. Trends in Cell Biology, 21(6): 354-361.[16]Xiao A, Wang Z, Hu Y, et al. 2013. Chromosomal deletions and inversions mediated by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas in zebrafish[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(14): e141.[17]Zamore PD, Tuschl T, Sharp PA, et al. 2000. RNAi: double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 nucleotide intervals[J]. Cell, 101(1): 25-33.[18]Zhang L, Jia R, Palange NJ, et al. 2015. Large Genomic Fragment Deletions and Insertions in Mouse Using CRISPR/Cas9[J]. PLoS One, 10(3): e0120396.[19]Zu Y, Tong X, Wang Z, et al. 2013. TALEN-mediated precise genome modification by homologous recombination in zebrafish[J]. Nature Methods, 10(4): 329-331. |
|
|
|
