|
|
|
| Study on the Inhibitory Effect of Rhizosphere Biocontrol Bacteria on Fusarium oxysporum in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Grafted Seedlings |
| GAO Xing1,*, CHEN Li-Da1,2,*, CHAI A-Li2, XIE Xue-Wen2, GAO Wei3, BEN Hai-Yan3, WU Xiao-Lei1, GONG Bin-Bin1, LYU Gui-Yun1, WU Jun4, LI Bao-Ju2,**, GAO Hong-Bo1,** |
1 College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China; 2 Insititute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 Plant Protection Research Institute, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin 300381, China; 4 Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Grafting, as an important means of preventing soil borne diseases and overcoming continuous cropping obstacles, has been widely used in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) production. To investigate the interaction between the resistance of grafted tomatoes to wilt disease and beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere soil. In this study, the tomato rootstock 'TMS' and scion 'Huangxing No. 1' were used for grafting. The dilution plate method was used to isolate and screen beneficial microorganisms in the tomato grafted rhizosphere, and the biological characteristics and indoor antibacterial activity of beneficial microorganisms were determined. The results showed that the number of cultivable bacteria and biocontrol bacteria in tomato grafted rhizosphere soil was significantly higher than that in seedlings (P<0.05). Using the plate confrontation method, Bacillus subtilis SF61 and Bacillus velezensis SF105 were successfully screened from 128 strains of biocontrol bacteria, showing antibacterial effects against Fusarium oxysporum with inhibition rates of 63.53% and 69.41%, respectively. In addition, strains SF61 and SF105 both had the ability to produce siderophore and amylase (without potassium and phosphorus solubilization functions), and significantly reduced glucosidase and unit pigment content (P<0.05). Among them, the siderophore produced by SF61 and SF105 had inhibitory effects on the hyphae of F. oxysporum. This study provides a theoretical basis for the breeding of vegetable rootstock varieties with disease resistance and disease prevention and control.
|
|
Received: 03 October 2025
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
**hongbogao@hebau.edu.cn; libaoju@caas.cn.
|
| About author:: *These authors contributed equally to this work |
|
|
|
[1] 车建美, 刘波, 朱育菁, 等. 2006. 尖孢镰刀菌β-D-葡萄糖苷酶活性测定条件的研究[J].江西农业大学学报, 28(1): 126-129. (Che J M, Liu B, Zhu Y J, et al.2006. Study on the determination conditions of β-D-glucosidase activity in Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Agriculture University, 28(1): 126-129.) [2] 陈利达, 许奥, 吴晓蕾, 等. 2025. 番茄抗枯萎病砧木品种筛选与评价[J]. 华北农学报, 40(S1): 256-262. (Chen L D, Xu A, Wu X L, et al.2025. Screening and evaluation of tomato rootstock varieties resistant to wilt disease[J]. Huabei Agricultural Journal, 40(S1): 256-262.) [3] 崔堂兵, 刘清香. 2010. 尖孢镰刀菌生产蒽醌色素的液体发酵条件研究[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 30(9): 56-61. (Cui T B, Liu Q X.2010. Study on liquid fermentation conditions for anthraquinone pigment production by Fusarium oxysporum[J]. China Biotechnology, 30(9): 56-61.) [4] 韩松, 张守村, 黄晓艳, 等. 2011a. 一株产铁载体内生细菌对尖孢镰刀菌的拮抗作用[J]. 西北植物学报, 31(5): 1039-1044. (Han S, Zhang S C, Huang X Y, et al.2011. Antagonism of an endophytic bacterium producing siderophore against Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 31(5): 1039-1044.) [5] 韩松, 张守村, 林天兴, 等. 2011b. 一株拮抗棉花枯萎病菌产铁载体内生细菌的筛选[J].安徽农业科学, 39(21): 12712-12713+12729. (Han S, Zhang S C, Lin T X, et al.2011. Screening of an antagonistic endophytic bacterium producing siderophore against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science, 39(21): 12712-12713+12729.) [6] 金艳丽. 2022.燕麦根腐病(Fusarium graminearum)生防菌筛选鉴定及作用机理研究[D]. 硕士学位论文, 甘肃农业大学, 导师: 姚拓, pp. 16-17. (Jin, Y L.2022. Screening and identification of biocontrol bacteria for root rot of oats (Fusarium graminearum) and study of antibacterial mechanism[D]. Thesis for M. S., Gansu Agricultural University. Supervisor: Yao T, pp. 16-17.) [7] 林彬. 2024. 薰衣草根际土壤产铁载体细菌的筛选及生防作用研究[D]. 硕士学位论文, 伊犁师范大学, 导师: 恩特马克•布拉提白, pp. 37-39. (Lin B.2024. Screening of iron-producing carrier bacteria in rhizosphere soil of lavenderand its biocontrol effect[D]. Thesis for M. S., YiLi Normal University, Supervisor: Entmak Bulatbai, pp. 37-39.) [8] 卢盼玲, 玄立杰, 张红梅, 等. 2025. 抗性砧木嫁接提高番茄枯萎病抗性机理研究[J/OL]. 西北农业学报, 1-9. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1220.S.20250331.1515.002. (Lu P L, Xuan L J, Zhang H M, et al.2025. Study on the mechanism for improving tomato resistance to Fusarium wilt through grafting with resistant rootstock[J/OL]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica.1-9. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1220.S.20250331.1515.002.) [9] 聂鑫淼, 栾恒, 冯改利, 等. 2022. 硅营养和嫁接砧木对黄瓜幼苗耐冷性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 49(8): 1795-1804. (Nie X M, Luan H, Feng G L, et al.2022. Effects of silicon nutrition and grafting rootstocks on chilling tolerance of cucumber seedlings[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 49(8): 1795-1804.) [10] 田甜. 2013. 土壤熏蒸剂棉隆与生防粘帚霉防治黄瓜枯萎病的协同作用及其机制[D]. 硕士学位论文, 中囯农业科学院, 导师: 李世东, pp. 27-28. (Tian T.2013. Synergistic effect and mechanism of dazomet and clonostachys rosea against cucumber Fusarium wilt[D]. Thesis for M. S., Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Supervisor: Li S D, pp. 27-28.) [11] 武志江, 李业燕, 王亚军, 等. 2015. 百合枯萎病拮抗细菌的筛选、鉴定及其抑菌物质研究[J]. 微生物学通报, 42(7): 1307-1320. (Wu Z J, Li Y Y, Wang Y J, et al.2015. Isolation and identification of an antagonistic bacterium against Fusarium on lily and its antifungal substances[J]. Microbiology China, 42(7): 1307-1320.) [12] 闫丽霞, 李磊, 丁常宗, 等. 2024. 黄瓜霜霉病生防菌ZF515分离鉴定及防效试验[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 40(3): 670-678. (Yan L X, Li L, Ding C Z, et al.2024. Isolation, identification of antagonistic bacteria ZF515 and Its biocontrol effect on cucumber downy mildew[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 40(3): 670-678.) [13] 朱瑜, 周信雁, 魏宇飞, 等. 2024. 嫁接对番茄植株根际微生物群落组成的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 37(1): 199-209. (Zhu Y, Zhou X Y, Wei Y F, et al.2024. Effects of grafting on soil microbial community in rhizospheres of tomatoes[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 37(1): 199-209.) [14] Chen L D, Xie X W, Kang H J, et al.2022. Efficiency of calcium cyanamide on the control of tomato soil-borne disease and their impacts on the soil microbial community[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 176: 104522. [15] Cooper R M, Wood R K S.1975. Regulation of synthesis of cell wall degrading enzymes by Veticilium alboatrum and Fusarium oxysporum f sp. lycopersici[J]. Physiological Plant Pathology, 5(2): 135-156. [16] Devi N O, Tombisana Devi R K, Debbarma M, et al.2022. Effect of endophytic Bacillus and arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) against Fusarium wilt of tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici[J]. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 32(1): 1. [17] Fu S J, Chen J Q, Wu X L, et al.2022. Comprehensive evaluation of low temperature and salt tolerance in grafted and rootstock seedlings combined with yield and quality of grafted tomato[J]. Horticulturae, 2022, 8(7): 595. [18] Qiao Y Z, Wang Z D, Sun H, et al.2024. Synthetic community derived from grafted watermelon rhizosphere provides protection for ungrafted watermelon against Fusarium oxysporum via microbial synergistic effects[J]. Microbiome. 12, 101. [19] Qiu M, Li S, Zhou X, et al.2014. Decoupling of root-microbiome associations followed by antagonist inoculation improves rhizosphere soil suppressiveness[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 50(2): 217-224. [20] Zhang H, Yao D, Zhang G, et al.2025. Effect of grafted scion varieties on apple root growth, carbon and nitrogen metabolism and microbiome in roots and rhizosphere soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 206: 105841. [21] Zhou X, Zhang J, Khashi U Rahman M, et al.2023. Interspecific plant interaction via root exudates structures the disease suppressiveness of rhizosphere microbiomes[J]. Molecular Plant, 16(5): 849-864. |
| [1] |
YUE Hao-Feng, ZHAO Tian-Yi, LI Hai-Xiao, YAN Qiu-Jing, XU Ya-Di, MENG Ya-Nan, CAO Zhi-Yan, LIU Ning, DONG Jin-Gao. Identification and Expression Analysis of Siderophore Synthetic Gene Cluster of Setosphaeria turcica[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2024, 32(5): 1121-1131. |
|
|
|
|