|
|
Research on Ammonia Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus and Microbial Diversity in Soil after Biogas Slurry Irrigation |
|
|
Abstract The livestock wastewater can be reused by biogas slurry irrigation in farmland to solve the problem of subsequent disposal to a certain extent. But the loss of nitrogen and phosphorus will lead to the risk of groundwater pollution after long-term biogas slurry irrigation. In this study, the adsorption and migration behaviors of ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and total phosphorus (TP) were investigated by simulated biogas slurry irrigation soil column with different soil media. Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology was applied to study the soil microbial α diversity variation before and after biogas slurry irrigation. The results showed that different soil media had different effects on the adsorption capacity of NH3-N and TP. Purple soil had the strongest adsorption capacity of NH3-N and TP while river sand had the weakest adsorption capacity. Two days after biogas slurry irrigation, Purple soil quickly adsorbed NH3-N in the surface and middle soil, while the adsorption of ammonia nitrogen decreases in the bottom soil with time. After biogas slurry irrigation, NH3-N in biogas slurry migrated to -25 cm soil layer in purple soil, and the concentration of NH3-N in leachate was 11.52 mg/L; NH3-N migrated to -45 cm soil layer in river sand, and the concentration of NH3-N was 211.80 mg/L, which had a trend of continuous downward migration. The concentration of TP in leachate of purple soil and sandy loam soil at -35 cm layer was 0.23 mg/L and 1.42 mg/L respectively, which could adsorbed and fixed total phosphorus and prevented phosphorus from migrating downward. Meanwhile, the irrigation of biogas slurry reduced the microbial diversity and abundance, and changes the community structure in purple soil. Shannon index and Chao index of purple soil after biogas slurry irrigation were 5.51 and 112.40, respectively. Proteobacteria was the most abundant and Verrucomicrobia was the least abundant. This study provides a certain theoretical basis for the adsorption and migration process of nitrogen and phosphorus elements in soil after biogas slurry irrigation. The impact of soil microbial diversity is also revealed after biogas slurry irrigation. In addition, the subsequent impact on soil and surrounding environment after biogas slurry irrigation is in favor of further comprehension.
|
Received: 18 March 2019
Published: 22 July 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]邓蓉, 陈玉成, 史秋萍.模拟沼液淋溶灌溉对土壤下渗水的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2013, 27(3):68-71
[2]冯丹妮,2014.连年施用沼液对“稻—油”轮作土壤微生物学特性的影响[D].硕士学位论文, 四川农业大学,导师:伍钧.pp:1-56 (Feng DN, 2014. Influence of continuous application of biogas slurry on microbial characteristics in rice-rape rotation operation soil[D]. Thesis for M.S., Sichuan Agricultural University, Supervisor:Wu J.PP:1-56)
[3]靳红梅, 常志州, 叶小梅, 等.江苏省大型沼气工程沼液理化特性分析[J].农业工程学报, 2011, 27(1):291-296
[4]姜桂华.铵态氮在土壤中吸附性能探讨[J].建筑科学与工程学报, 2004, 21(2):32-34
[5]李波, 杨欣.渗滤液中氨氮在土壤和地下水中迁移转化实验[J].环境卫生工程, 2006, 14(2):20-22
[6]李慧, 2014.氨氮在黄土包气带中吸附解吸特征和影响因素探讨[D].硕士学位论文,长安大学, 导师:王文科pp:1-(Li H., 2014.The characteristic and influence factors of ammonia-nitrogen adsorption desorption in the Loess[D]. Thesis for M.S., Chang,an University, Supervisor:Wang WK.PP:1-91)
[7]刘荣厚, 郝元元, 叶子良, 等.沼气发酵工艺参数对沼气及沼液成分影响的实验研究[J].农业工程学报, 2006, 22(1):85-88
[8]吕家珑.土壤磷淋溶状况及其磷&; 突变点&; 研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2003, 22(2):142-146
[9]孙良媛, 刘涛, 张乐, 等.中国规模化畜禽养殖的现状及其对生态环境的影响[J].华南农业大学学报:社会科学版, 2016, 15(2):23-30
[10]王敏锋, 严正娟, 陈硕, 等.施用粪肥和沼液对设施菜田土壤磷素累积与迁移的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(7):1351-1359
[11]田伟, 李刚, 陈秋会, 等.等氮条件下化学肥料与有机肥连续大量施用下的环境风险[J].生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(5):440-445
[12]王而力, 王嗣淇, 杨立伟.西辽河流域沙土对磷的吸附行为[J].环境科学研究, 2011, 24(2):222-228
[13]王玮, 孙岩斌, 周祺, 等.国内畜禽厌氧消化沼液还田研究进展[J].中国沼气, 2015, 33(2):51-57
[14]谢真越, 卓慕宁, 李定强, 等.不同施肥水平下菜地径流氮磷流失特征[J].生态环境学报, 2013, 22(8):1423-1427
[15]杨志兵, 王金生, 滕彦国, 等.垃圾渗滤液有机组分和氨氮在孔隙介质中的迁移特征[J].生态环境学报, 2008, 17(4):1407-1410
[16]朱金山, 张慧, 马连杰, 等.不同沼灌年限稻田土壤微生物群落分析[J].环境科学, 2018, 39(5):2400-2411
[17]詹美礼, 杨璘, 张文捷, 等.成层土壤中氨氮入渗迁移试验研究[J].安全与环境学报, 2010, 10(2):11-16
[18]Abubaker J, Cederlund H, Arthurson V, et al.Bacterial community structure and microbial activity in different soils amended with biogas residues and cattle slurry[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2013, 72:171-180.[J].Applied Soil Ecology, 2013, 72:171-180
[19]Brevik E C, Cerdà A, Mataix-Solera J et al.The interdisciplinary nature of soil[J]. SOIL, 2015, 1:117-129.[J].SOIL, 2015, 1:117-129
[20]Bergmann G T, Bates S T, Eilers K G, et al.The under-recognized dominance of Verrucomicrobia in soil bacterial communities[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2011, 43(7):1450-1455
[21]Dalahmeh S S, Jonson H, Hylander L D, et al.Dynamics and functions of bacterial communities in bark, charcoal and sand filters treating greywater[J]. Water Research, 2014, 54:21-32.[J].Water Research, 2014, 54:21-32
[22]Leff J W, Jones S E, Prober S M, et al.Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(35):10967-10973
|
|
|
|