|
|
|
| Expression of AmFIM Gene in Solanum nigrum and Its Effect on Flower Development |
| FENG Li-Jun1, CHEN Ke-Li1, HAO Yan-Min1, LI Fei-Fei1, CUI Min-Long1,2, PIAO Chun-Lan1,2* |
1 College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China;
2 Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province/College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The unusual floral organs (UFO) gene and its orthologous genes have an important role in the regulating the identity of floral meristem and the development of floral organs, and its functions have been revealed in many species. AmFimbriata (AmFIM) is the earliest cloned UFO like gene, compared with other UFO like genes, it has certain differences in function and gene interaction. In addition, the study of AmFIM in Antirrhinum majus was limited to transposon-mediated mutants. Therefore, the function of AmFIM gene needs further verification and improvement. In this experiment, the pBI35S:: AmFIM overexpression vector was heterologously transformed in Solanum nigrum, the morphological observation found that the transgenic S. nigrum plants showed obvious dwarf, early flowering phenotype, and the difference in AmFIM gene expression had different effects on S. nigrum cymes and floral organs. In weakly phenotypic lines, the number of flowers in each inflorescence was reduced, the apical inflorescence architecture was complicated, and the floral organs were not significantly different compared with the wild type; in strongly phenotypic lines, the cymes were transformed into single flowers, the floral organs were homozygously transformed, the sepals became larger, petaloid tissue appeared in sepals and stamens, staminoid tissue appeared in carpels, and sepals fused with petals, petals fused with stamens. The internal structure of stamenloid carpel of transgenic S. nigrum was further observed by paraffin section, and it was found that there were tissues similar to anthers and pollen. The results showed that the overexpression of AmFIM gene in S. nigrum affects the inflorescence architecture and the development of floral organs, reflecting the function of AmFIM gene in regulating the determinacy of floral meristems, floral organ differentiation and maintaining floral organ boundaries. This study further improves the research content of AmFIM gene and provides a reference for the molecular regulation mechanism of UFO like genes.
|
|
Received: 15 March 2022
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
*chunlan_piao@zafu.edu.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] 郝燕敏, 陈柯俐, 冯丽君, 等. 2022. 欧洲千里光 SvAPETALA1 基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 39(4): 821-829.
(Hao Y, Chen K L, Feng L J, et al. 2022. Cloning and functional analysis of SvAPETALA1 in Senecio vulgaris[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, 39(4): 821-829.)
[2] 祁宏英, 姚美玲, 徐洪国. 2017. 龙葵花芽分化形态解剖学研究[J]. 北方园艺, 41(09): 135-138.
(Qi H Y, Yao M L, Xu H G. 2017. Anatomical and morphological characteristics of development of flower bud differentiation in Sola- num nigrum L.[J]. Northern Horticulture, 41(09): 135-138.)
[3] Castel R, Kusters E, Koes R. 2010. Inflorescence development in petunia: Through the maze of botanical terminology[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(9): 2235-2246.
[4] Chae E, Tan Q K, Hill T A, et al. 2008. An Arabidopsis F-box protein acts as a transcriptional co-factor to regulate floral development[J]. Development, 135(7): 1235-1245. Coen E S, Meyerowitz E M. 1991. The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development[J]. Nature, 353(6339): 31-37.
[5] Durfee T, Roe J L, Sessions R A, et al. 2003. The F-box-containing protein UFO and AGAMOUS participate in antagonistic pathways governing early petal development in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100(14): 8571-8576.
[6] Hake S. 2008. Inflorescence architecture: The transition from branches to flowers[J]. Current Biology, 18(23): R1106-1108.
[7] Ingram G C, Doyle S, Carpenter R, et al. 1997. Dual role for fimbriata in regulating floral homeotic genes and cell division in Antirrhinum[J]. EMBO Journal, 16(21): 6521-6534.
[8] Ingram G C, Goodrich J, Wilkinson M D, et al. 1995. Parallels between UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS and FIMBRIATA, genes controlling flower development in Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum[J]. The Plant Cell, 7(9): 1501-1510.
[9] Jack T, Fox G L, Meyerowitz E M. 1994. Arabidopsis homeotic gene APETALA3 ectopic expression: Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation determine floral organ identity[J]. Cell, 76(4): 703-716.
[10] Krizek B A, Meyerowitz E M. 1996. The Arabidopsis homeotic genes APETALA3 and are sufficient to provide the B class organ identity function[J]. Development, 122(1): 11-22.
[11] Lee I, Wolfe D S, Nilsson O, et al. 1997. A LEAFY co-regulator encoded by UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS[J]. Current Biology, 7(2): 95-104.
[12] Lemmon Z H, Park S J, Jiang K, et al. 2016. The evolution of inflorescence diversity in the nightshades and heterochrony during meristem maturation[J]. Genome Research, 26(12): 1676-1686.
[13] Levin J Z, Meyerowitz E M. 1995. UFO: An Arabidopsis gene involved in both floral meristem and floral organ development[J]. The Plant Cell, 7(5): 529-548.
[14] Lippman Z B, Cohen O, Alvarez J P, et al. 2008. The making of a compound inflorescence in tomato and related nightshades[J]. PLOS Biology, 6(11): e288.
[15] Mckim S, Hay A. 2010. Patterning and evolution of floral structures-marking time[J]. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 20(4): 448-453.
[16] Park S J, Eshed Y, Lippman Z B. 2014. Meristem maturation and inflorescence architecture-lessons from the Solanaceae[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 17: 70-77.
[17] Park S J, Jiang K, Schatz M C, et al. 2012. Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109(2): 639-644.
[18] Pnueli L, Hareven D, Rounsley S D, et al. 1994. Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants[J]. The Plant Cell, 6(2): 163-173.
[19] Rebocho A B, Bliek M, Kusters E, et al. 2008. Role of EVER-GREEN in the development of the cymose petunia inflorescence[J]. Developmental Cell, 15(3): 437-447.
[20] Samach A, Klenz J E, Kohalmi S E, et al. 1999. The UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS gene of Arabidopsis thaliana is an F-box protein required for normal patterning and growth in the floral meristem[J]. The Plant Journal, 20(4): 433-445.
[21] Simon R, Carpenter R, Doyle S, et al. 1994. Fimbriata controls flower development by mediating between meristem and organ identity genes[J]. Cell, 78(1): 99-107.
[22] Souer E, Rebocho A B, Bliek M, et al. 2008. Patterning of inflorescences and flowers by the F-Box protein DOUBLE TOP and the LEAFY homolog ABERRANT LEAF AND FLOWER of petunia[J]. The Plant Cell, 20(8): 2033-2048.
[23] Taylor S, Hofer J, Murfet I. 2001. Stamina pistilloida, the pea ortholog of Fim and UFO, is required for normal development of flowers, inflorescences, and leaves[J]. The Plant Cell, 13(1): 31-46.
[24] Theissen G. 2001. Development of floral organ identity: Stories from the MADS house[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 4(1): 75-85.
[25] Thomson B, Wellmer F. 2019. Molecular regulation of flower development[J]. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 131: 185-210.
[26] Yu H Y, Huang T B. 2016. Molecular mechanisms of floral boundary formation in Arabidopsis[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(3): 317.
[27] Yuste-Lisbona F J, Quinet M, Fernández-Lozano A, et al. 2016. Characterization of vegetative inflorescence (mc- vin) mutant provides new insight into the role of MACRO- CALYX in regulating inflorescence development of tomato[J]. Scientific Reports, 6: 18796.
[28] Zhao Y F, Zhang T, Broholm S K, et al. 2016. Evolutionary co- option of floral meristem identity genes for patterning of the flower-like Asteraceae inflorescence[J]. Plant Physiology, 172(1): 284-296.
[29] Zhu Y, Wagner D. 2020. Plant inflorescence architecture: The formation, activity, and fate of axillary meristems[J]. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 12(1): 034652. |
|
|
|
