Differentially Proteins in Colaphellus bowringi Treated with Sip Toxin Protein by iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomics
YIN Yan-Li1, SHA Jun-Xue1, ZHANG You-Ran1, TAN Jia-Li1, SUN Jing1, GAO Ze-Ping1, LI Hai-Tao1,2,*
1 College of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China; 2 Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / State Key Laboratory of Biology of Plant Diseases and Pests, Beijing 100193, China
Abstract Secreted insecticidal protein (Sip) is a secretory insecticidal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal family, which is toxic to Coleoptera larvae. Colaphellus bowringi is a common pest of Cruciferae. Sip protein has high insecticidal activity against the Colaphellus bowringi. In this experiment, the isotope relative labeling and absolute quantification technique (iTRAQ) was used to analyze the differential expression protein of Colaphellus bowringi protein, and the differential proteins were screened and subjected to functional annotation and enrichment analysis. Quantitative analysis was performed by ProteinpilotTM V4.5 software, and Gene Ontology (GO) function annotation, Cluster of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG)function annotation and KEGG analysis were performed, and functional enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG enrichment) was performed on all significantly differential proteins. Compared with the control group, 47 proteins were identified in the experimental group with quantitative information, including 27 up-regulated proteins and 20 down-regulated proteins. Through GO function annotation, COG and KEGG analysis, it was found that these differential proteins mainly involved molecular functions such as binding and catalytic activity, among which the functions unique to up-regulated proteins were electron carrier activity, antioxidant activity and molecular converter activity. These proteins mainly performed biological processes such as cell processes and metabolic processes, in which only up-regulated proteins were involved in death, immune system processes, exercise, and viral replication. These proteins mainly consisted of cells, cell parts, organelles, etc. It was predicted that these differential proteins might have functions such as post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperone, translation, ribosome structure and biosynthesis, translation, ribosome structure and biosynthesis, etc. In the biochemical metabolic pathway and signal transduction pathway, the up-regulated protein and the down-regulated protein shared a common pathway for the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. The pathways that were important for up-regulating differential proteins were metabolic pathways, microbial metabolism in different environments, secondary metabolic biosynthesis, and pyruvate metabolism. The specific pathways for down-regulating proteins included the ribosomal pathway, systemic lupus erythematosus, and pancreatic secretory pathway. Through enrichment analysis, the main biological functions of these differential proteins were found to be nuclear nucleosomes, non-membrane bounded organelles, intracellular non-membrane bounded organelles, nucleosomes, ribosomes, COPI envelope vesicles, protein-DNA complex, secretory granules, nuclear chromatin, Golgi heap, etc. After treatment with Sip toxin protein, some receptors common to Bt toxin were found to be differentially expressed, among which alkaline phosphatase (Alp), G-protein, cadherin and aminopeptidase N (APN) were differentially expressed. The results provide a reference for the study of the mechanism and for the proteomics study of Sip toxin.
YIN Yan-Li,SHA Jun-Xue,ZHANG You-Ran, et al. Differentially Proteins in Colaphellus bowringi Treated with Sip Toxin Protein by iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomics[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2019, 27(10): 1793-1803.
1 赖锡婷, 唐仁新, 杨东, 等. 2009. 大猿叶虫龙南种群的生物学特性[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 46(5): 710-713. (Lai X T, Tang R X, Yang D, et al.2009. Biological characteristics of the Longnan population of Colaphellus bowringi Baly[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 46(5): 710-713. ) 2 刘家骧, 周惟敏, 关明卓, 等. 1998. 大猿叶甲发生规律与防治[J]. 北方农业学报, (1): 29-30. (Liu J X, Zhou W M, Guan M Z, et al. 1998. Occurrence and prevention of Colaphellus bowringi# Baly[J]. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science, (1): 29-30.) 3 刘艳杰, 李海涛, 刘荣梅, 等. 2012. Bt新型基因sip的克隆、表达和生物信息学分析[J]. 生物技术通报, (12): 101-105. (Liu Y J, Li H T, Liu R M, et al. 2012. Cloning, expression and bioinformatics analysis of novel Bt gene sip#[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, (12): 101-105.) 4 沙君雪, 迟宝岩, 张金波, 等. 2018. 大猿叶甲转录组测序及生物学信息分析[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 26(6): 978-986. (Sha J X, Chi B Y, Zhang J B, et al.2018. Transcriptome sequencing and biological information analysis of Colaphellus bowringi Baly[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 26(6): 978-986.) 5 魏晓棠, 肖海军, 刘云国, 等. 2009. 大猿叶虫四地理种群遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 昆虫学报, 52(6): 672-678. (Wei X T, Xiao H J, Liu Y G, et al.2009. RAPD analysis of genetic diversity of four geographic populations of Colaphellus bowringi Baly[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 52(6): 672-678.) 6 薛芳森, 李爱青, 朱杏芬, 等. 2002. 大猿叶虫生活史的研究[J]. 昆虫学报, 45(4): 494-498. (Xue F S, Li A Q, Zhu X F, et al.2002. Study on the life history of Colaphellus bowringi Baly[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 45(4): 494-498.) 7 袁小红, 李凤艳, 戴勇, 等. 2018. 应用iTRAQ定量蛋白质组学技术对β-地中海贫血患者血浆差异蛋白的定量分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 26(2): 9-12. (Yuan X H, Li F Y, Dai Y, et al.2018. Quantitative analysis of plasma differential proteins in patients with β-thalassemia using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics[J]. Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity, 26(2): 9-12.) 8 张金波, 李海涛, 刘荣梅,等. 2015. Bt菌株DQ89的sip基因的克隆、表达及杀虫活性分析[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 31(4): 598-602. (Zhang J B, Li H T, Liu R M, et al.2015. Cloning, expression and insecticidal activity analysis of sip gene of Bt strain DQ89[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 31(4): 598-602.) 9 邹超, 肖亮, 何海敏, 等. 2017. 大猿叶虫生活史特性的地理变异[J]. 昆虫学报, 60(1): 60-66. (Zou C, Xiao L, He H M, et al.2017. Geographical variation of life history characteristics of Colaphellus bowringi Baly[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 60(1): 60-66.) 10 Donovan W P, Engleman J T, Donovan J C, et al.2006. Discovery and characterization of Sip1A: A novel secreted protein from Bacillus thuringiensis with activity against coleopteran larvae[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 72(4): 713-719. 11 Fernandez L E, Aimanova K G, Gill S S, et al.2006. A GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatase is a functional midgut receptor of Cry11Aa toxin in Aedes aegypti larvae[J]. Biochemical Journal, 394(Pt 1): 77. 12 Flannagan R D, Yu C G, Mathis J P, et al.2005. Identification, cloning and expression of a Cry1Ab cadherin receptor from European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)[J]. Insect Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, 35(1): 33-40. 13 Jurat-Fuentes J L, Adang M J.2004. Characterization of a Cry1Ac-receptor alkaline phosphatase in susceptible and resistant Heliothis virescens larvae[J]. FEBS Journal, 271(15): 3127-3135. 14 Murawska E, Fiedoruk K, Bideshi D K, et al.2013. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. thuringiensis strain IS5056, an isolate highly toxic to Trichoplusia ni[J]. Genome Announcements, 1(2): e0010813. 15 Nagamatsu Y, Toda S, Koike T, et al.1998. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the Bombyx mori receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal CryIA(a) toxin[J]. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 62(4): 727-734. 16 Palmal L, Munoz D, Berry C, et al.2014. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: An overview of their biocidal activity[J]. Toxins, 6(12): 3296-325. 17 Rajagopal R, Agrawal N, Selvapandiyan A, et al.2003. Recombinantly expressed isoenzymic aminopeptidases from Helicoverpa armigera (American cotton bollworm) midgut display differential interaction with closely related Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins[J]. Biochemical Journal, 370(3): 971-978. 18 Ross P L, Huang Y N, Marchese J N, et al.2004. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents[J]. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 3(12): 1154-1169. 19 Tsukita S, Tsukita S, Nagafuchi A, et al.1992. Molecular linkage between cadherins and actin filaments in cell-cell adherens junctions[J]. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 4(5): 834.
