|
|
Effect of Swine (Sus scrofa) Sperm Capacitation In vitro and Acrosome Reaction on Expression of Spermadhesins Gene and Seminal Plasma Motility Inhibitor (SPMI) mRNA |
2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 |
|
|
Abstract To analyze the association between mRNA expression levels of Spermadhesins gene (AQN1, AQN3, AWN, PSPⅠand PSPⅡ) and sperm motility inhibitor gene (SPMI) in ejaculated sperm with sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction status, swine (Sus scrofa) sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction status were induced in vitro. The expression levels of Spermadhesins and SPMI genes in sperms were analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR (sqRT-PCR). The results showed that the percentage of sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction was 58.41% and 35.34%, respectively. Most Spermadhesins mRNA expression levels were increased with capacitation time prolonged. AQN1 and PSPⅡ mRNA levels were increased a little with capacitation for 4 h, while significantly increased with capacitation for 8 h (P<0.05). The difference between 4 and 8 h was not significant (P>0.05). AQN3 and PSPⅠmRNA level demonstrated the similar expression rythme, with no significant change at 4 h capacitation or significant higher at 8 h capacitation than 4 h and control. AWN mRNA level was decreased with capacitation time prolonged, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). SPMI mRNA level was decreased at 4 h capacitation and increased at 8 h capacitation, but no obvious rythme with no significant difference among groups (P>0.05). AQN1, AQN3, PSPⅠ, PSPⅡ and SPMI mRNA level were all increased after acrosome reaction induced by progesterone ( P4) except AWN, among which PSPⅠand PSPⅡ were increased significantly (P<0.05), and AWN was decreased significantly (P<0.05). The results showed that Spermadhesins might play a positive control on sperm capacitation, or take part in the interaction of oocytes and sperms. SPMI gene might not work on sperm acrosome reaction and capacitation. This study will be helpful greatly to further research the mechanism of sperm action, capacitation and acrosome reaction.
|
Received: 10 September 2014
Published: 13 May 2015
|
|
|
|
Austin C R, 1951. Observations of the penetration of sperm into the mammalian egg. Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Series B, 4: 581~596Chang, M C, 1951. Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited into the fallopian tubes. Nature, 168: 697~698Dadoune J P, 2009 Spermatozoal RNAs: what about their functions? Microsc Res Tech, 72(8): 536-551Dostàlovà Z, Calvete J J, Sanz L, T?pfer-Petersen E, 1994. Quantitation of boar spermadhesins in accessory sex gland fluids and on the surface of epididymal, ejaculated and capacitated spermatozoa. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1200: 48-54García Herreros M, Aparicio I M, Nú?ez I, García-Marín L J, Gil M C, Pe?a Vega FJ, 2005. Boar sperm velocity and motility patterns under capacitating and non-capacitating incubation conditions. Theriogenology, 63(3): 795-805Harrison RAP, 1996. Capacitation mechanisms and the role of capacitation as seen in eutherian mammals. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 8: 581–594Jonáková V, Manásková P, Kraus M, Liberda J, Tichá M, 2000. Sperm surface proteins in mammalian fertilization. Mol Reprod Dev, 56(2 Suppl): 275-277Manásková P, Jonáková V, 2008. Localization of porcine seminal plasma (PSP) proteins in the boar reproductive tract and spermatozoa. J Reprod Immunol, 78: 40-48Reinert M, Calvete J J, Sanz L, Mann K, T?pfer-Petersen E, 1996. Primary structure of stallion seminal plasma protein HSP-7, a zona-pellucida-binding protein of the spermadhesin family. Eur J Biochem, 242(3): 636-640Romero A, Romao MJ, Varela PF, K¨olln I, D′?as JM, Carvalho AL, et al, 1997. The crystal structures of two spermadhesins reveal the CUB domain fold. Nat Struct Biol , 4: 783-788Song C Y, B Gao, H Wu, X Y Wang, G H Chen and J Mao, 2010. Spatial and temporal expression of spermadhesin genes in reproductive tracts of male and female pigs and ejaculated sperm. Theriogenology, 73: 551-559Song C Y, 2010. Molecular cloning of several pig sperm functional genes and characterization of their mRNA expression profiles in the genital tracts and ejaculated sperm. Dissertation for Ph.D., Yangzhou University, Supervisor:Chen G H, pp.121~135 (宋成义, 2010. 若干猪精子功能基因克隆及其mRNA在生殖道和成熟精子中的表达特性研究, 博士学位论文. 扬州大学, 导师:陈国宏, pp.121~135)Strzezek J, Wysocki P, Kordan W, et al, 2005. Proteomics of boar seminal plasma - current studies and possibility of their application in biotechnology of animal reproduction. Reprod Biol, 5(3): 279-290T?pfer-Petersen E, Calvete J J, 1995. Molecular mechanisms of the interaction between sperm and the zona pellucida in mammals: studies on the pig. Int J Androl, 18 Suppl 2:20-6T?pfer-Petersen E, Romero A, Varela PF, Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Dostalova Z, Sanz L, et al, 1998. Spermadhesins: a new protein family. Facts, hypotheses and perspectives. Andrologia, 30: 217-24Wang W, Abeydeera L, Fraser L, Niwa K, 1995. Functional analysis using chlortetracycline fluorescence and in vitro fertilization of frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa incubated in a protein free chemically defined medium. J Reprod Fertil, 104: 305-303 |
[1] |
ZHU Xiao-Feng, XU Hou-Qiang, CHEN Wei, CHEN Ying-Lian, NI Kai, WU Xiao-Min, NI Meng-Meng, LU Xian-Jun. Cloning, Expression and Bioinformatics Analysis of IGF-1 and IGF-2 Genes in Congjiangxiang Pigs (Sus scrofa)[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2019, 27(8): 1382-1391. |
|
|
|
|