管理评论 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 3-14.

• 物理-事理-人理系统方法论(WSR) •    

物理-事理-人理系统方法论25周年回顾——溯源、释义、比较与前瞻

寇晓东1, 顾基发2   

  1. 1. 西北工业大学人文与经法学院, 西安 710129;
    2. 中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院, 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 发布日期:2021-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 寇晓东(通讯作者),西北工业大学人文与经法学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士
  • 作者简介:顾基发,国际系统与控制科学院院士,中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院研究员,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJCZH074)。

A Twenty-five-year Review of WSR Methodology: Origin, Connotation, Comparison and Outlook

Kou Xiaodong1, Gu Jifa2   

  1. 1. School of Humanities, Economics and Law, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710129;
    2. Academy of Mathematics and Systems Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2019-07-01 Published:2021-06-03

摘要: 在物理-事理-人理系统方法论(WSR)迎来25岁“生日”之际,选择从四个角度进行回顾:一是“溯源”,从“殊”与“共”“干”与“支”“东”与“西”三方面,对WSR的源头和演进做出新阐释。二是“释义”,分“初级”“高级”两阶段,对WSR的意涵给出相对完整的解读。三是“比较”,以TOP、CmCvAwAs、三阶控制论、Shinayakana等方法论为对象,揭示WSR与它们的共通之处。四是“前瞻”,提出WSR面临的挑战、机遇和下步发展的重点所在。

关键词: WSR方法论, 25周年回顾, 发展前瞻

Abstract: Since Wuli-Shili-Renli Systems Methodology (WSR) is to meet its 25-year birthday, the authors give a review of it from four aspects. Firstly, on origin of WSR, a new illumination of its starting point and evolution is put forward from three perspectives, i.e., difference and commonness, mainstream and anabranch, east and west. Secondly, on connotation of WSR, a comparatively complete analysis of its implication is offered from two phases, including primary phase and high-level phase. Thirdly, on comparison of WSR, methodologies such as TOP, CmCvAwAs, three order cybernetics and Shinayakana are compared to WSR to discover their similarities and commonness. Finally, on outlook of WSR, challenges and opportunities faced by it and key points of its future development are all suggested.

Key words: WSR Methodology, twenty-five-year review, development outlook