管理评论 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 68-79.

• 经济与金融管理 • 上一篇    

中国FDI企业环境绩效的影响机理研究——不同环境创新行为的双重中介模型

金基瑶1,2, 杜建国1   

  1. 1. 江苏大学管理学院, 镇江 212013;
    2. 扬州市职业大学经贸学院, 扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-23 发布日期:2021-02-03
  • 作者简介:金基瑶,江苏大学管理学院,博士,扬州市职业大学经贸学院讲师;杜建国,江苏大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    研究阐释党的十九大精神国家社科基金重大专项(18VSJ038);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(18YJC630059);国家自然科学基金项目(71974081;71704066);江苏高校青蓝工程项目;扬州市职业大学优秀青年骨干教师项目;江苏高校哲学社会科学重点基地“绿色发展与环境治理研究中心”项目;江苏省高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队“新时代高校强化党的全面领导的协同创新机制研究团队”项目;扬州市职业大学优秀教学团队项目。

Research on the Mechanism of Chinese FDI Enterprises' Environmental Performance——Double Mediating Model of Different Environmental Behavior

Jin Jiyao1,2, Du Jianguo1   

  1. 1. School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013;
    2. School of Economics and Trade, Yangzhou Vocational College, Yangzhou 225009
  • Received:2017-10-23 Published:2021-02-03

摘要: 本文沿着“因素—行为—绩效”的研究思路,基于东道国政府和母公司视角,根据现有研究成果构建结构方程模型,对我国部分FDI企业进行实际调研,对环境规制、跨境环境管理与FDI企业取得高水平环境绩效之间的关系做了实证验证,并用Bootstrap方法检验环境技术创新行为和环境管理创新行为同时作为中介变量的中介效应。研究结果表明:(1)东道国的环境规制和母公司的跨境环境管理对于FDI企业获得高水平的环境绩效没有直接影响,环境创新行为起到完全中介作用。(2)东道国的环境规制可以通过直接影响FDI企业实施环境创新行为,也可以通过规制母公司进而间接影响FDI企业。但母公司的跨境环境管理对激发企业环境创新行为的影响明显高于东道国的环境规制。(3)环境技术创新行为和环境管理创新行为共同发挥的中介效应要明显大于其中一种的独立作用,但两者在不同的自变量之间所起到的中介作用有一定差异性。在此基础上,本文提出了一些建议和对策。

关键词: 环境规制, 跨境环境管理, 环境创新行为, 环境绩效, Bootstrap中介效应检验

Abstract: Based on the path of "factor-behavior-performance", the perspective of host country government and parent company, the conceptual SEM is built according to the existing researches. This paper investigates parts of FDI enterprises in China, then validates the relationship among environmental regulation, cross-border environmental management and high level environmental performance. In addition, we use Bootstrap method to test the mediating effect of coordinated mediating variables of environmental technology innovation behavior and environmental management innovation behavior respectively. Our research reveals that (1) Environmental regulation and cross-border environment management have no direct effect on high level environmental performance, and innovation behavior plays a full mediating role. (2) Environmental regulation could both stimulate the environmental innovation behavior directly and by the effect on parent company indirectly. However, the effect of cross-border environment management is much greater than environmental regulation. (3)The total effect of two mediating variables is greater than any of them obviously, but they have different roles between different independent variables. Finally this paper puts forward some suggestions based on the above conclusions.

Key words: environmental regulation, cross-border environmental management, environmental innovation behavior, environmental performance, Bootstrap mediating effect test